City of St. Paul v. Byrnes
Decision Date | 08 February 1888 |
Citation | 36 N.W. 449,38 Minn. 176 |
Parties | City of St. Paul v. James A. Byrnes. City of St. Paul v. Frederick W. Luley and another. City of St. Paul v. John Patridge |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
In each of the above cases the defendants were arrested and brought before the municipal court of St. Paul, upon complaints charging them with violations of ordinance No. 64 of that city, (Mun. Code, St. Paul, 403,) relating to slaughter and packing-houses. The defendants were tried convicted and sentenced, and appeal from the judgments.
Judgment reversed in each case, and complaints dismissed.
Geo. C Ripley and A. B. Jackson, for appellant Byrnes.
Warner & Lawrence, for appellants Luley and another.
I. V D. Heard, for appellant Patridge.
W. P. Murray, for respondent.
These cases may be considered and determined together. They involve the construction of chapter 370, Sp. Laws 1887, approved February 26, 1887, and the effect thereof as respects the operation of ordinance No. 64 of the city of St. Paul in reference to "slaughter and packing-houses." The first section of this ordinance provides that no person shall kill, slaughter, dress, or pack any cattle, calves, sheep, or swine, or establish a manufactory for candles or soap, within the limits of the city, without a permit of the city council. The second section relates to the procedure for obtaining a permit, the third and fourth include regulations for the management of the business, and section 5 provides a penalty for the violation of the ordinance. The following is the statute referred to:
These prosecutions were instituted for the violation of the ordinance by the defendants since the passage of the special act; and it appears that the alleged offences against...
To continue reading
Request your trial