City of West Palm Beach v. Grimmett

• Decision Date: 31 July 1931
• Citation: 136 So. 320,102 Fla. 680
• Parties: CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, Florida, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff in Error v. Ola GRIMMETT, joined by her husband and next friend, E. C. Grimmett, and E. C. Grimmett, in his own right, Defendants in Error.[*]
• Court: Florida Supreme Court

136 So. 320

102 Fla. 680

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, Florida, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff in Error v. Ola GRIMMETT, joined by her husband and next friend, E. C. Grimmett, and E. C. Grimmett, in his own right, Defendants in Error.^[*]

Florida Supreme Court, Division B.

July 31, 1931

Error to Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; C. E. Chillingworth, Judge.

COUNSEL

J. Mark Wilcox, of West Palm Beach, and Snedigar & Baya, of Miami, for plaintiff in error.

Boozer & Boozer, of West Palm Beach, for defendants in error.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., and WHITFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

---------

Notes:

^[*] For opinion denying rehearing, see 137 So. 385.

---------