City of West Plains v. Noland
Decision Date | 07 December 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 5830.,5830. |
Parties | CITY OF WEST PLAINS v. NOLAND. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Howell County; Will H. D. Green, Judge.
"Not to be published in State Reports."
Dean Noland was convicted for violation of an ordinance of the City of West Plains and he appeals.
Reversed and defendant ordered discharged.
Frank A. Lowry, of Cape Girardeau, for appellant.
Homer Rinehart, of West Plains, for respondent.
Appellant, defendant in this case, was prosecuted for violation of an ordinance of the city of West Plains. Complaint was filed by the city attorney, alleging that the defendant violated section 2 of Ordinance 753, of the city of West Plains, passed and approved on the 19th day of August, 1935; by operating a delivery truck upon the streets of the city of West Plains, for the purpose of making delivery of goods, wares, and merchandise, without having paid a city license, as provided by the ordinance above mentioned.
Defendant filed a motion to quash the information which was overruled. The trial was before a jury. The jury found defendant guilty as charged in the complaint and assessed his punishment at a fine of $25. Defendant filed a motion for new trial and motion in arrest of judgment, which were overruled and from which defendant has appealed.
The evidence was that the defendant was employed by the Moon Distributing Company a corporation, having a place of business at Cape Girardeau, Mo., and one at Little Rock, Ark. Defendant's employer, the Moon Distributing Company, was engaged in the liquor business. Defendant was a salesman for this company and West Plains was in his territory. Defendant traveled by truck, taking orders at West Plains and other towns for liquor, which he would fill by delivering the following week, from his truck to the merchants who had placed their orders the week previously.
The evidence showed that defendant got to West Plains approximately once a week for the purpose of taking orders and delivering liquor. The deliveries, according to the evidence, were merchandise, the orders for which had been taken the previous week.
It was admitted that the defendant had not paid the license tax specified in the ordinance. This ordinance is as follows:
Defendant attempted to show that the ordinance was not enforced as to residents of the city of West Plains. There was also evidence to the effect that part of the order delivered on the date of defendant's arrest was liquor from the Hiram Walker Distillery Company at Peoria, Ill., which had been ordered by a drug merchant at West Plains, and shipped through the Moon Distributing Company.
The evidence further disclosed that all of the necessary license taxes had been paid on the truck in question and that the truck was owned in and operated from Cape Girardeau, Mo.
Defendant demurred to the evidence at the close of the trial, which demurrer was by the court overruled and objections and exceptions were duly taken.
The sole question involved in this case is whether or not the city of West Plains had a right to levy a license tax on the truck operated by the defendant, for the purpose of delivering merchandise into the city of West Plains.
Under section 6840, R.S.Mo.1929, Laws 1931, p. 277, Mo.St.Ann. § 6840, p. 5639, cities of the third class may license delivery trucks, ice trucks, transfer trucks, and other trucks. This case does not involve an ordinance under the police...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hammett v. Kansas City
... ... Guckenberger, 51 Ohio App. 228, 200 ... N.E. 210; Columbus & So. Oh. Elec. Co. v. West, 36 ... N.E.2d 3; McGill v. St. Joseph, 38 S.W.2d 725; ... Schwaller v. May, 115 S.W.2d 207; ... Greenspon, 272 Mo. 288, 198 S.W. 1107; Laws ... 1921 (Ex. Sess.), p. 76; City of West Plains v ... Noland, 112 S.W.2d 79; St. Louis v. Temples, 129 S.W.2d ... Clarence ... ...
-
Kansas City v. Frogge
... ... Ex parte Tarling, 241 S.W. 929; City of Sikeston v ... Marsh, 110 S.W.2d 1135; City of West Plains v ... Nolen, 112 S.W.2d 79; Henneford v. Silas Mason ... Co., 57 S.Ct. 524, 300 U.S ... ...
-
City of Poplar Bluff v. Poplar Bluff Loan & Bldg. Ass'n
...of Trenton, 358 Mo. 273, 214 S.W.2d 31; Carter Carburetor Corp. v. City of St. Louis, 356 Mo. 646, 203 S.W.2d 438; City of West Plains v. Noland, Mo.App., 112 S.W.2d 79.3 Holland Furnace Co. v. City of Chaffee, Mo.App., 279 S.W.2d 63, 68; Wilhoit v. City of Springfield, 237 Mo.App. 775, 171......
-
State v. Griffith
... ... GRIFFITH et al ... No. 18768 ... Kansas City Court of Appeals. Missouri ... January 10, 1938 ... ...