City of Winston-Salem v. Yarbrough
| Decision Date | 06 April 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 43P95.,43P95. |
| Citation | 456 S.E.2d 519,340 N.C. 260 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM v. J.R. YARBROUGH and wife, Ruth N. Yarbrough; Jerone C. Herring, Trustee, Branch Banking and Trust Company; R. Larry Feimster, Trustee; and Ramey, Inc. |
Ronald G. Seeber, City Atty., Charles C. Green, Jr., Asst. City Atty., Roddey M. Ligon, Jr., Gusti W. Frankel, Winston-Salem, for City of Winston-Salem.
G. Dudley Humphrey, Winston-Salem, Sharon L. McConnell, Raleigh, F. Joseph Treacy, Jr., Charles H. Rabon, Jr., Charlotte, for Yarbrough.
Prior report: 117 N.C.App. 340, 451 S.E.2d 358.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants (Yarbroughs) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 1995."
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Jones v. Kearns
...against city attorney in his individual capacity), disc. review denied, 340 N.C. 110, 456 S.E.2d 311, disc. review denied, 340 N.C. 260, 456 S.E.2d 519 (1995). In any event, the facts of this case nevertheless reveal that Officer Kearns undertook no special duty with respect to plaintiff. I......
-
Dep't of Transp. v. Riddle
...at the time of taking. City of Winston–Salem v. Yarbrough, 117 N.C.App. 340, 346, 451 S.E.2d 358, 363, disc. rev. denied, 340 N.C. 260, 456 S.E.2d 519 (1995) ; D.O.T. v. Nelson Co., 127 N.C.App. 365, 489 S.E.2d 449 (1997).7. Unity of ownership is established within the meaning of Town of Mi......
-
Department of Transp. v. Nelson Co.
...§ 40A-67 (1996). In City of Winston-Salem v. Yarbrough, 117 N.C.App. 340, 346, 451 S.E.2d 358, 363, disc. review denied, 340 N.C. 260, 456 S.E.2d 519 (1995), this Court noted that N.C.G.S. § 40A-67 intended to codify the longstanding common law test for unity of use announced in [T]here mus......
-
Department of Transp. v. Airlie Park, Inc.
...v. Yarbrough, 117 N.C.App. 340, 344, 451 S.E.2d 358, 362 (1994), disc. reviews denied, 340 N.C. 110, 456 S.E.2d 311 and 340 N.C. 260, 456 S.E.2d 519 (1995). The "unity rule" was articulated by our Supreme Court in Barnes v. Highway Commission, 250 N.C. 378, 109 S.E.2d 219 (1959), as There i......
Request a trial to view additional results