City of Winston-Salem v. Tickle, WINSTON-SALEM

Citation304 N.C. 724,288 S.E.2d 808
Decision Date12 January 1982
Docket NumberWINSTON-SALEM
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
PartiesCITY OFv. Katie S. Ziglar TICKLE (widow), et al.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff.

Petree, Stockton, Robinson, Vaughn, Glaze & Maready, Winston-Salem, for defendant.

Plaintiff's petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 53 N.C.App. 516, 281 S.E.2d 667. Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Dept of Trans v. Joe C. Rowe et al
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 18 April 2000
    ...omitted). Applying this rule in City of Winston-Salem v. Tickle, 53 N.C. App. 516, 281 S.E.2d 667 (1981), disc. review denied, 304 N.C. 724, 288 S.E.2d 808 (1982), our Court held that all of the tracts making up a family owned cattle farm was property affected by the taking of a portion of ......
  • Department of Transp. v. Rowe
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 20 June 2000
    ...omitted). Applying this rule in City of Winston-Salem v. Tickle, 53 N.C.App. 516, 281 S.E.2d 667 (1981),disc. review denied, 304 N.C. 724, 288 S.E.2d 808 (1982), our Court held that all of the tracts making up a family owned cattle farm was property affected by the taking of a portion of th......
  • City of Winston-Salem v. Yarbrough
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 20 December 1994
    ...N.C. 705, 347 S.E.2d 437 (1986); City of Winston-Salem v. Tickle, 53 N.C.App. 516, 281 S.E.2d 667 (1981), disc. review denied, 304 N.C. 724, 288 S.E.2d 808 (1982); and Board of Transportation v. Martin, 296 N.C. 20, 249 S.E.2d 390 (1978). Plaintiff then concedes that with regard to condemna......
  • Department of Transp., Div. of Admin. v. Jirik
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 11 December 1986
    ...131, 89 L.Ed. 618 (1944); City of Winston-Salem v. Tickle, 53 N.C.App. 516, 524, 281 S.E.2d 667, 671 (1981), review denied, 304 N.C. 724, 288 S.E.2d 808 (1982). In this case, it is undisputed that the three parcels are physically contiguous and are all owned by Jirik. The parties disagree, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT