City School Dist. of City of Newburgh v. Hugh Stubbins & Associates, Inc.

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtKAYE
CitationCity School Dist. of City of Newburgh v. Hugh Stubbins & Associates, Inc., 626 N.Y.S.2d 741, 85 N.Y.2d 535, 650 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1995)
Decision Date02 May 1995
Parties, 650 N.E.2d 399 CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF NEWBURGH, Appellant, v. HUGH STUBBINS & ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Respondents.
OPINION OF THE COURT

KAYE, Chief Judge.

When a defectively assembled pipe fitting bursts, damaging a library's book collection, can the library sue those responsible for design and construction of the building some 15 years earlier? Because the rule is settled that an owner's cause of action accrues against a builder upon completion of construction, and we perceive no basis to apply a different rule where a cause of action rests on damage to personal rather than real property, we conclude that plaintiff's cause of action was time-barred.

In 1972 or 1973, the Urban Development Corporation agreed to assist the Newburgh School District in the design, financing and construction of a library. The City of Newburgh Urban Renewal Agency transferred title to a parcel of property to the UDC, which entered into contracts to construct the building with defendants Solart Builders, Inc. as general contractor, Hugh Stubbins & Associates, Inc. as architect, and Van Zelm, Heywood & Shadford as mechanical and electrical engineers. Upon completion of construction in late 1975, UDC sold the building to plaintiff.

Within the structure of the building was a copper pipe fitted with a steel plug, which began a gradual chemical corrosion of the integrity of the pipe. Fifteen years later, on October 13, 1990, a water pipe in the library burst, causing plaintiff to suffer $1,500,000 damage to personal property--including books, bookshelves, and office supplies and furnishings--and $500,000 damage to its real property. When plaintiff brought suit against defendants alleging five causes of action rooted in negligence, Supreme Court dismissed the complaint, upon motion of the defendants, as barred by the Statute of Limitations since a cause of action for defective construction and design generally accrues upon completion of construction. The Appellate Division affirmed, as do we.

In cases against architects or contractors, the accrual date for Statute of Limitations purposes is completion of performance (Sosnow v. Paul, 36 N.Y.2d 780, 369 N.Y.S.2d 693, 330 N.E.2d 643; see also, State of New York v. Lundin, 60 N.Y.2d 987, 471 N.Y.S.2d 261, 459 N.E.2d 486; Cabrini Med. Ctr. v. Desina, 64 N.Y.2d 1059, 489 N.Y.S.2d 872, 479 N.E.2d 217). We made clear in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Assocs., 43 N.Y.2d 389, 401 N.Y.S.2d 767, 372 N.E.2d 555 that no matter how a claim is characterized in the complaint--negligence, malpractice, breach of contract--an owner's claim arising out of defective construction accrues on date of completion, since all liability has its genesis in the contractual relationship of the parties.

Plaintiff recognizes that any claim for damage to the building...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
67 cases
  • Royal Ins. Co. of America v. Ru-Val Elec. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • March 12, 1996
    ...generally accrues at the time of the breach, not when the injury is sustained. City Sch. Dist. of Newburgh v. Stubbins & Associates, 85 N.Y.2d 535, 538, 626 N.Y.S.2d 741, 742-43, 650 N.E.2d 399, 400-401 (1995); Bulova Watch Co. v. Celotex Corp., 46 N.Y.2d 606, 610, 415 N.Y.S.2d 817, 819, 38......
  • Media Glow Digital, LLC v. Panasonic Corp. of N. Am.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 6, 2019
    ...the plaintiff and the defendant is the functional equivalent of privity."); City Sch. Dist. of City of Newburgh v. Hugh Stubbins & Assocs., 85 N.Y.2d 535, 539, 650 N.E.2d 399, 401, 626 N.Y.S.2d 741, 742 (1995); see also Stapleton v. Pavilion Building Installation Sys., supra, 2017 WL 431801......
  • In re Cavalry Const., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 30, 2010
    ...and the subcontractor knew that work was being done for the owner's benefit); City Sch. Dist. of Newburgh v. Hugh Stubbins & Assocs., Inc., 85 N.Y.2d 535, 626 N.Y.S.2d 741, 650 N.E.2d 399, 401 (1995) (finding the functional equivalent of privity between the ultimate owner and the subcontrac......
  • Scholastic Inc. v. Pace Plumbing Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 28, 2015
    ...was the date on which Pace completed its work in the construction of the building (see City School Dist. of City of Newburgh v. Stubbins & Assoc., 85 N.Y.2d 535, 626 N.Y.S.2d 741, 650 N.E.2d 399 [1995] ). The determination of that date would then be an evidentiary issue to be determined thr......
  • Get Started for Free