Clark v. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas
Decision Date | 20 June 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 13038.,13038. |
Citation | 153 S.W.2d 668 |
Parties | CLARK et ux. v. DALLAS JOINT STOCK LAND BANK OF DALLAS. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; Sarah T. Hughes, Judge.
Suit by the Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas against W. B. Clark and wife, Lucy V. Clark, for debt, evidenced by a note, and for foreclosure of a trust deed on realty. Prior to the institution of the suit the realty was sold at a trustee's sale, and the plaintiff became the purchaser thereof. To secure possession of the realty, the plaintiff amended its petition, setting up claim on the note and foreclosure of the trust deed, and claim in trespass to try title for the title and possession of the realty. The defendants filed pleas of privilege which were overruled. From an adverse judgment, the defendants appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Allen & Allen, of Dallas, Mayo W. Neyland, of Greenville, and W. H. Crunk, of Cooper, for appellants.
Lawther, Cramer, Perry & Johnson, of Dallas, for appellee.
The plaintiff (appellee), Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas, instituted this suit in a District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against the defendants (appellants), W. B. Clark and wife, Lucy V. Clark, for debt, evidenced by note, and for foreclosure of deed of trust on land located in Delta County, Texas. The note and deed of trust were executed by defendants, the note made payable in Dallas County. It appears from the pleadings that, prior to the institution of the suit, the land was sold at trustee's sale; plaintiff became the purchaser thereof, and received a deed in conformity with such sale. However, to secure possession of the land, which was in dispute, plaintiff amended its petition, setting up claim against defendants in two counts: One, upon said note and foreclosure of the deed of trust, and the second, in trespass to try title for the title and possession of the land.
In due time, and in proper form, the defendants filed pleas of privilege to be sued in Delta County, on the ground that the land in suit is situated in that county (Art. 1995, Subd. 14, R.C.S., 1925). The pleas of privilege were timely controverted, plaintiff contending that the suit in trespass to try title is merely incidental to its original cause of action on the note, payable in Dallas County, hence, the venue of both counts lies in Dallas County.
On hearing in the 95th District Court of Dallas County, June 22, 1939, the pleas of privilege were overruled; the defendants excepted and gave notice of appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals. Thereafter, on November 24, 1939, at a subsequent term, the cause was, in the 14th District Court, duly tried to a jury on its merits, and, on the verdict rendered, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for title and possession of the land in suit; to which judgment, appellants also gave notice of appeal and, on January 26, 1940, filed the following appeal bond:
It will be observed from the bond filed that this appeal is from the judgment on the merits of the case, entered on November 24, 1939, by the 14th District Court of Dallas County; and that the judgment overruling the pleas of privilege, entered on June 22, 1939,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Conlee v. Burton
...Graham, Tex.Com.App., 52 S.W.2d 263; General Exchange Ins. Corp. v. Hill et al., Tex.Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 287; Clark v. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank, Tex.Civ.App., 153 S.W.2d 668. In this instance the appeal has been timely perfected by the giving of notice of appeal and the filing of an ap......
-
Reitmeyer v. Ferris Rental Center, Inc.
...the judgment of the justice court overruling their plea of privilege, their failure to do so waives such plea. See Clark v. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank, 153 S.W.2d 668, 670 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1941, no writ); Motor Securities Corp. v. Jones, 90 S.W.2d 858, 859 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1936, n......
-
Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. Dyess
...Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 543; Panhandle Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Badgett, Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 466; Clark v. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas, Tex.Civ.App., 153 S.W.2d 668; Motor Securities Corporation v. Jones, Tex. Civ.App., 90 S.W.2d 858; Smith Bros. Grain Company v. Windsor & ......
-
Reynolds v. Groce-Wearden Co., GROCE-WEARDEN
...the term of court at which the plea of privilege was overruled.' (Because of appellee's contention, citing Clark v. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank, Tex.Civ.App., 153 S.W.2d 668, and Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co. v. Dyess, Tex.Civ.App., 167 S.W.2d 294, that it was necessary......