Clark v. Kay
Citation | 26 Ga. 403 |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Decision Date | 31 August 1858 |
Parties | Clark, Austin & Smith, plaintiffs in error. vs. Wm. Kay,defendant in error. |
Debt, in Fulton Superior Court. Tried before Judge Bull, April Term, 1858.
The facts of this case are stated in the opinion delivered by the Court.
Thomas L. Cooper, for plaintiffs in error.
A. W. Hammond & Son, contra.
By the Court.—Benning, J., delivering the opinion.
The plaintiffs in error, sued the defendant in error, upon a bond of which the following is a copy:
"Georgia, Fulton county.
I, William Kay, of the county and State aforesaid, for and in consideration of my liability unto Messrs. Clark, Austin & Smith, of the city of New York, upon the five original notes of which, the above and foregoing are true copies, " (the copies being, one, for $500, payable at seven months after date; one, for $550.50, payable at four months after date; one, for $420.50, payable eight months after date; one, for $550.50, payable at five months after date; one, for $508.75, payable at three months after date;) ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Rothenberg
...were not regarded as interest)); Georgia (Camilla Cotton Oil Co. v. Spencer Kellogg & Sons, 257 F.2d 162 (5th Cir.1958); but see Clark v. Kay, 26 Ga. 403 (1858)); Idaho (Easton v. Butterfield Live Stock Co., 48 Idaho 153, 279 P. 716 (1929); Eagle Rock Corp. v. Idamont Hotel Co., 59 Idaho 41......
-
United Cable v. Burch
...have been held void as a penalty in Fellows, 257 F. at 972; Knight, 191 P. at 532; Semico, 538 S.W.2d at 275; and Clark, Austin & Smith v. Kay, 26 Ga. 403, 406 (1858). Corbin flatly states that "[o]ne case in which the courts all agree that the amount is a penalty and unenforceable is where......
-
Camilla Cotton Oil Co. v. Spencer Kellogg and Sons
...on the legal rate is collectible in Georgia upon default is seen in Alexander v. Troutman, 1 Ga. 469. Camilla strongly urges upon us Clark v. Kay, 26 Ga. 403, an opinion never cited by the Georgia Courts, in which in sweeping language it is said that any stipulation of damages for the nonpa......
- Carney v. Matthewson