Clark v. Schwartz

Decision Date14 October 1993
Docket NumberNo. A93A1173,A93A1173
Citation210 Ga.App. 678,436 S.E.2d 759
PartiesCLARK et al. v. SCHWARTZ.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Smith, Howard & Ajax, John A. Howard, Kenneth B. Hodges III, Maria A. Salterio, Atlanta, for appellants.

Kutak Rock, Thomas R. Todd, Jr., Angela M. Gottsche, Atlanta, for appellee.

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Schwartz originally filed this action seeking an accounting following the dissolution of an alleged partnership for the practice of law. Defendants Clark & Smith, P.C., Emory L. Clark and Hoke Smith III denied that they had ever been in a partnership with plaintiff. The original complaint was replaced in toto by an amended complaint which stated an action for damages and sought to recover the value of plaintiff Schwartz's interest in the alleged partnership. Upon the trial of the case, a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $84,265.66, including prejudgment interest, and against defendants Clark and Smith. Defendants appealed and raise several issues including whether the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to authorize the jury's verdict. Held:

We find that the evidence and law requires a conclusion that there was no partnership, and consequently the verdict awarding the value of an interest in a partnership was not authorized. The trial court erred in entering a judgment predicated on the verdict of the jury and in denying defendants' motions for directed verdict, j.n.o.v., and new trial predicated on the insufficiency of the evidence.

"A partnership is an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit." OCGA § 14-8-6(a). A partnership results from a contract, either express or implied. Huggins v. Huggins, 117 Ga. 151, 155(1), 43 S.E. 759 (1903). A contract is not complete and enforceable until there is a meeting of the minds as to all essential terms. OCGA § 13-3-2; Reichard v. Reichard, 262 Ga. 561, 564(2), 423 S.E.2d 241 (1992); Sierra Assoc., Ltd. v. Continental Illinois Nat. Bank, etc., Co. of Chicago, 169 Ga.App. 784, 791(3b), 315 S.E.2d 250 (1984).

In the case sub judice, the scales of justice are heavily weighted by substantial evidence on both sides of the question of whether there was a partnership agreement. However, there is no proof of a meeting of minds as to at least one essential term, what portion of the alleged partnership was plaintiff's. Plaintif...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Durkin v. Platz
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • 30 January 2013
    ...of a business for profit.” A partnership results from a contract, which may be either express or implied. Clark v. Schwartz, 210 Ga.App. 678, 436 S.E.2d 759, 760 (1993). The question is whether the parties intended to form a partnership. Ghee v. Kimsey, 179 Ga.App. 446, 346 S.E.2d 888, 889 ......
  • Johnson v. University Health Services, Inc., CV 194-033.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Georgia
    • 3 June 1996
    ...minds as to all essential terms. Complete Concepts, Ltd. v. General Handbag Corp., 880 F.2d 382 (11th Cir.1989); Clark v. Schwartz, 210 Ga.App. 678, 436 S.E.2d 759 (1993). Both parties must concur in all terms of the proposed contract, agreeing to the same thing in the same sense. Associate......
  • Cherokee County v. Martin
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 23 January 2002
  • Antoskow & Associates, LLC v. Gregory, No. A05A1626.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 14 December 2005
    ...237 Ga.App. 656, 660(2), 516 S.E.2d 371 (1999). 8. Added as a handwritten correction and initialed by "CPA." 9. Clark v. Schwartz, 210 Ga.App. 678, 679, 436 S.E.2d 759 (1993). 10. (Footnote omitted.) Aaron Rents, Inc. v. Fourteenth Street Venture, L.P., 243 Ga.App. 746, 747(1), 533 S.E.2d 7......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Business Associations - Paul A. Quiros and Lynn Schutte Scott
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 46-1, September 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...(Del. 1991)). 119. Id. at 411. 120. Id. at 412 (citing Boeing Co. v. Shrontz, No. 11273,1992 WL 81228 (Del. Ch. April 20, 1992)). 121. 210 Ga. App. 678, 436 s.e.2d 759 (1993). 122. Id. at 679, 436 s.e.2d at 760. 123. Id. 124. Id. (citing Huggins v. Huggins, 117 Ga. 151, 155, 43 s.e. 759 (19......
  • Business Associations - Paul A. Quiros, Lynn S. Scott, William B. Shearer Iii, and James F. Brumsey
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 56-1, September 2004
    • Invalid date
    ...Id. at 799-800, 595 S.E.2d at 649. 138. Id. at 801, 595 S.E.2d at 649 (citation and punctuation omitted) (quoting Clark v. Schwartz, 210 Ga. App. 678, 679, 436 S.E.2d 759, 760 (1993)). 139. Id., 595 S.E.2d at 649-50. 140. Id., 595 S.E.2d at 649. 141. Id., 595 S.E.2d at 650 (quoting Lemming ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT