Clark v. Walton, 76-2535

Decision Date03 June 1977
Docket NumberNo. 76-2535,76-2535
Citation347 So.2d 670
PartiesRobert N. CLARK, as the City Clerk of the City of Sunrise, Appellant, v. Dennis J. WALTON, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

H. Mark Purdy, Parkhurst, LaHurd & Purdy, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Frank E. Hamilton, III, Hamilton, Douglas & Bennett, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

We have jurisdiction of this Interlocutory Appeal of an Order adjudging Appellant in contempt because it is an Order in an action formerly cognizable in equity and an Order entered after Judgment in a civil action. Article V, Section 4(b)(1), Florida Constitution. Fla.App.Rule 4.2(a).

Appellant is a City Clerk who was ordered by Mandamus to provide a list of the names and addresses of city employees to Appellee who is a business agent of a labor union. That Mandamus Writ is on appeal to this court but not under consideration here.

After appeal of the "Final Judgment granting Peremptory Writ of Mandamus" was filed the Appellee moved to have the Appellant held in contempt of court because he had not complied with the Judgment and failed to obtain a stay order as required by Section 119.11(2), Florida Statutes (1975), which says a notice of appeal shall not operate as an automatic stay.

The Appellant replied to the Motion for Contempt by citing Fla.App.Rule 5.12 which says when an officer (clerk) of a political subdivision of the state (a city) takes an appeal then the notice of appeal stays the execution of the order appealed.

There is a direct conflict between Section 119.11(2), Florida Statutes (1975) and Fla.App.Rule 5.12 so we must first determine if the subject matter of the two is procedural or substantive. If it is procedural then the Rule prevails. Article V, Section 2, Florida Constitution. Section 25.371, Florida Statutes (1975). In re: Clarification of Florida Rules of Prac. & Pro., 281 So.2d 204 (Fla.1973).

Procedural law is that law which governs and defines the methods by which the substantive law is effected and enforced. In this case the substantive law is the matter disputed whether or not the City Clerk is required to furnish the names and addresses. The trial court determined that he should so furnish and the Clerk appealed. No stay order was entered and the application of the union man to have the Clerk held in contempt for non-compliance with the Judgment was granted. The obtaining of a stay order to prevent a contempt order or other enforcement of a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Wait v. Florida Power & Light Co.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 25, 1979
    ...the conflict between the decision of the First District in the present case and the decision of the Fourth District in Clark v. Walton, 347 So.2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), which held that the automatic stay provision of rule 5.12(1) takes precedence over the conflicting language of section 1......
  • Boutwell v. Nichol's Alley of Jacksonville, Inc., JJ-278
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 17, 1978
    ...probability that opening the records for inspection will result in significant damage. Section 119.11(3). "In Clark v. Walton, 347 So.2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), it was held that whether a public agency taking an appeal need obtain a stay order is procedural, therefore Rule 5.12(1) takes pr......
  • Wait v. Florida Power & Light Co., HH-406
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 19, 1978
    ...probability that opening the records for inspection will result in significant damage. Section 119.11(3). In Clark v. Walton, 347 So.2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), it was held that whether a public agency taking an appeal need obtain a stay order is procedural, therefore Rule 5.12(1) takes pre......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT