Clarke v. Bacall
| Decision Date | 20 May 1898 |
| Parties | CLARKE v. BACALL. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
J.W. Corcoran and W.B. Sullivan, for petitioner.
A.E Avery, for respondent.
This is an appeal to the superior court from a decision of the municipal court of the city of Boston denying a petition to vacate a judgment. The first exception is to the refusal of the judge to rule as follows: "This being a petition to vacate a judgment, and not a petition for a writ of review this court has no jurisdiction over the same, and the decision of the lower court is conclusive." A petition for a writ of review is a civil action. Davenport v. Holland 2 Cush. 1; Winch v. Hosmer, 122 Mass. 438. A petition to vacate a judgment, under our statute, is entered as a separate suit, like a petition for a writ of review, and is also, in a broad sense, a civil action. Yetten v. Conroy, 165 Mass. 238, 42 N.E. 1130. Appeals in such cases in district and police courts are allowed by our statutes. St.1893, c. 396, § 24; Pub.St. c. 154, §§ 39, 43. The provisions of these statutes apply, also, to the municipal court of the city of Boston. St.1894, c. 431, § 2. The case of Yetten v. Conroy, supra, which was decided under St.1893, c. 396, is conclusive upon the question before us. All the considerations in favor of holding that an appeal might be taken in such a case under that statute are equally applicable to cases under St.1895, c. 234. There is no good reason for making a distinction in this particular between a petition for a writ of review and a petition to vacate a judgment. The difference between them is in form, rather than in substance. A decision of a court refusing to vacate its own judgments or decrees may be appealed from as well as any other decision. Gale v. Nickerson, 144 Mass. 415, 11 N.E. 714; Tucker v. Fiske, 154 Mass. 574, 28 N.E. 1051; Yetten v. Conroy, 165 Mass. 238, 42 N.E. 1130. That St.1895, c. 234, § 2, does not permit the filing of a petition for a writ of review, or to vacate a judgment, in the supreme judicial court or superior court, when the judgment was rendered in a police, district, or municipal court, does not deprive the superior court of its appellate jurisdiction. Even under former statutes a petition to vacate a judgment could be filed only in the court in which the judgment was rendered. Stillman v. Donovan (Mass.) 49 N.E. 628. The ruling requested was rightly refused.
The court ordered a writ of review to issue, and the respondent excepted to this order. This exception must be sustained. The petition is to vacate the judgment, not to issue a writ of review. Upon the finding of the court, the prayer of the petitioner should have been granted, and the judgment vacated. The...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Copson v. New York, N.H. & H.R. Co.
...he was in the station at Hyde Park. But the conductor testified to going through the train and taking up the tickets of the passengers [50 N.E. 614]seven times between Pawtucket and Hyde Park, and said that all the passengers had paid their fares before the accident. He did not remember see......
- Copson v. New York, N.H. & H.R. Co.
-
Clarke v. Bacall
...171 Mass. 29250 N.E. 614CLARKEv.BACALL.Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.May 20, Exceptions from superior court, Suffolk county; Charles Shelley, Judge. Action by Barnabas Clarke against Charles H. Bacall. From a refusal of the superior court to rule as requested, defendant b......