Clayton v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 09 July 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 2364-7639.,2364-7639. |
Citation | 154 S.W.2d 453 |
Parties | CLAYTON v. CHICAGO, R. I. & G. RY. CO. et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action by Ocie L. Clayton against the Chicago, Rock Island & Gulf Railway Company and others to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while an employee of the named defendant. From a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals. To review the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, 129 S.W.2d 693, affirming the trial court's judgment, the plaintiff brings error.
Judgment affirmed.
L. D. Eakman, of Montague, and T. B. Coffield, of Bowie, for plaintiff in error.
Benson & Benson, of Bowie, and Jenkins Garrett, Walker, Smith & Shannon, and F. B. Walker, all of Fort Worth, for defendant in error.
GERMAN, Commissioner.
While Ocie Clayton was working as a sectionhand on a railroad, using a crowbar to pull spikes from the cross-ties, the bar, because of its defective condition, slipped and severely bruised the index finger on his left hand. He sued the railway company for damages. The trial court held that the plaintiff assumed the risk incident to his injury, and instructed a verdict for the defendant. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 129 S.W.2d 693.
The material facts are shown by plaintiff's own testimony, and are without any substantial dispute. The substance of his testimony, when reduced to a narrative form, is:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Benavidez v. Maxwell
...was less apparent and in the absence of warnings, the doctrine of assumed risk has defeated recovery. Clayton v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co., Tex.Com.App., 137 Tex. 441, 154 S.W.2d 453; Taylor v. White, Tex.Com.App., 212 S.W. 656; Morgan v. Stillwell, Tex.Civ.App., 247 S.W. 580; Galveston, ......
-
Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co. v. Coleman
...liability against the master. 29 Tex.Jur. 215 and 216; City of Panhandle v. Byrd, 130 Tex. 96, 106 S.W.2d 660; Clayton v. Chicago R. I. & G. R. Co., 137 Tex. 441, 154 S.W.2d 453. Appellant also alleged that in an effort to compromise this controversy without litigation it had paid appellee ......