Clingenpeel v. Citizens' Trust Co.
Decision Date | 06 April 1922 |
Docket Number | No. 22109.,22109. |
Parties | CLINGENPEEL v. CITIZENS' TRUST CO. OF BOONVILLE MO., et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cooper County; J. G. Slate, Judge.
Petition by William Clingenpeel against the Citizens' Trust Company of Boonville, Mo., and others, to set aside the will of Mary Clingenpeel, deceased. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Warner, Dean, Langworthy, Thomson & Williams, of Kansas City, for appellant Citizens' Trust Co. of Boonville.
Roy D. Williams, of Boonville, for other appellants.
Whit V. Draffen, of Boonville, Jeffries & Corum, of St. Louis, and Robert M. Reynolds, of Marshall, for respondent.
On April 3, 1919, plaintiff filed, in the circuit court of Cooper county, Mo., a petition to set aside the will of his mother, Mary Clingenpeel, dated September 24, 1918, on the alleged grounds that testatrix was not of sound mind when said will was executed, and that the execution of same was procured through the undue influence of the above-named trust company, and other persons interested therein.
On November 30, 1918, the will in controversy was admitted to probate in Cooper county aforesaid, and reads as follows:
Testatrix died, while a resident of Cooper county aforesaid, on the 27th day of September, 1918.
The trial of this case was commenced in the above county before a jury on November 25, 1919. The proponents of the will introduced in substance the following testimony: Mrs. William Sombart was at the hospital in Boonville, Mo., and was called to the room of testatrix. She was introduced to the latter, and Mr. Kingsbury said, "Mrs. Clingenpeel wants you to witness her will—do you, Mrs. Clingenpeel?" and the latter said, "Yes; I do." Mrs. Sombart then walked over and signed her name as a witness to the will. In her opinion, testatrix was of sound and disposing mind at that time. It is conceded that she never had any other acquaintance with testatrix except that detailed as above; that she did not know testatrix before, and had never heard her talk.
Dr. F. R. Smiley, a practicing physician of 30 years' standing at Boonville and other places, testified, in substance, that he was formerly engaged in hospital work at the Missouri Pacific Hospital in Kansas City, Mo.; that he treated testatrix, in consultation with Dr. McGuire, about a half dozen times, and talked with her on these occasions; that so far as he could see her mind was clear; that she knew exactly what she wanted, and expressed herself intelligently; that she had no hallucinations so far as he ever discovered; that he had had some experience with insanity in his practice; that he treated testatrix after she came to the hospital at Boonville, and remembers the occurrence of her making a will. The latter was handed witness, and he testified that he signed the same as a witness; that he was called by Mr. Kingsbury, who said Mrs. Clingenpeel wished to make a will and, wanted him to sign it as a witness; that he (witness) went to the hospital shortly afterwards and signed it after he had gotten Mrs. Sombart, who was to be another witness; that the three gathered in the room, to wit, Kingsbury, witness, and Mrs. Sombart, with testatrix, and signed it in the latter's presence; that the matter was entirely understood that it was her will, and that he had signed it as a witness; that he saw testatrix sign it; that she was pretty weak physically, but was strong enough to sit up in bed; that at the time she signed the will her mind was clear so far as he could see; that he was satisfied she knew exactly what she was doing, and wanted it done exactly as she said; that she died primarily of an ovarian tumor; that she probably had some peritonitis; that she at least had some blood poisoning; that the above did not affect her mind any more than any other infectious disease, such as typhoid for instance, which would cause delirium, but has no direct bearing on the mind.
On cross-examination, witness testified, in substance, that testatrix was very weak physically; that he had known her for about two years before her death; that he did not know her much; that he first met her when she came to his office for treatment with her husband and Dr. McGuire; that she was suffering with the tumor; that he tapped the tumor by using a hollow trocar or needle, which was inserted into it and drained out the fluid; that the needle was inserted through the abdominal wall; that he operated on her in this manner about one-half dozen times or more; that her circumference was probably three or four times the normal; that this pressed on the other abdominal organs and interfered with her digestion and general health; that the whole tendency of the tumor was to reduce her general health, but not necessarily rendering the mental condition any less acute; that such a tumor does not affect the mentality or sanity, but it affects the emotional nature; that of course the mental faculties under such circumstances...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Proffer v. Proffer
...indicated feebleness, both of body and mind, a submissable case is made. Minturn v. Conception Abbey, 61 S.W. (2d) 328; Clingingpeel v. Citizen's Trust Co., 240 S.W. 177. (6) An unjust disposition of property, by which a deserving child is disinherited, is an indication of failure of testat......
-
Clark v. Commerce Trust Co.
...40 S.W. (2d) 562; Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Lathrop, 111 U.S. 612, 28 L. Ed. 536; Appleby v. Brock, 76 Mo. 314; Clinginpeel v. Citizens Trust Co., 240 S.W. 177. (b) There was no error in permitting mental specialist, Dr. Edward T. Gibson, to testify that testatrix was of unsound mind. Hol......
-
Clark v. Commerce Trust Co.
... ... S.W.2d 562; Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Lathrop, 111 ... U.S. 612, 28 L.Ed. 536; Appleby v. Brock, 76 Mo ... 314; Clinginpeel v. Citizens Trust Co., 240 S.W ... 177. (b) There was no error in permitting mental specialist, ... Dr. Edward T. Gibson, to testify that testatrix was of ... ...
-
Hall v. Mercantile Trust Co.
...capacity if the insane delusion is on a subject included in the qualifications necessary for such testamentary capacity. Clingenpeel v. Citizens Trust Co., 240 S.W. 177; Cyc. 1013; Page on Wills (2 Ed.) 236; Alexander's Commentary on Wills, 445-6; Bishop v. Hunt, 24 Mo.App. 373; Knapp v. St......