Coal & Coke Co. v. Bank of Bevier, 17279.
Decision Date | 07 December 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 17279.,17279. |
Citation | 44 S.W.2d 188 |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Parties | CENTRAL COAL & COKE CO., APPELLANT, v. STATE BANK OF BEVIER, RESPONDENT. |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon County. — Hon. Vernon L. Drain, Judge.
REVERSED AND REMANDED (with directions).
Walter C. Goodson and Geo N. Davis for appellant
Ed. G. Robinson and C.G. Buster for respondent.
This is an action to establish a preferred claim in the amount of $1448.38, against the assets of the defendant bank in the hands of the commissioner of finance for liquidation. No question arises upon the sufficiency of the petition which, in part, bases the cause of action upon an alleged special deposit, and charges "that the Central Coal & Coke Company was a customer and a special depositor in said bank under an arrangement by which the amount of money needed by the Central Coal & Coke Company for the semi-monthly pay roll was sent to said bank, for which the said bank was paid by the rate of one dollar ($1) per one thousand ($1,000) dollars; that said money so deposited in said bank was a special deposit for a special purpose and not intended to swell and go into the assets of said bank, under a special agreement between the said bank and the Central Coal & Coke Company; and that on or about the 21st day of February, 1930, and while said bank was insolvent and known to be insolvent by its officers and agents, the Central Coal & Coke Company made a special deposit in said bank, for the purpose aforesaid, of $7123.11, and checks against the same exceeded the withdrawals in the sum of $1448.38, which amount of money was in the defendant bank at the time it closed, belonging to the Central Coal & Coke Company, and which plaintiff is entitled to recover."
Plaintiff demanded judgment in the sum of $1448.38, and that said judgment be declared a preferential claim. The answer was a general denial.
The cause was tried at the April, 1931, term of the circuit court of Macon county, and the court adjudged "that said claim be and is hereby disallowed as a preferential or priority claim" and "that plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant for the sum so claimed in his petition as a common claim." From this judgment plaintiff duly appealed and assigns error in the denial of a preference because the evidence shows there was a special deposit.
Plaintiff introduced the following agreed statement of facts:
The following letter also was introduced in evidence by plaintiff:
No reply to this letter appears in the record, but Mr. Agee testified he was the agent of the Central Coal & Coke Company at Bevier, and had complete control of the pay roll: the company had about 225 men; that he talked with the cashier of the bank about the letter and made arrangements with him about the pay roll account; the bank was to handle the pay roll and the company was to pay the bank $1 a thousand for the service; the company was to deposit the money with the Commerce Trust Company in Kansas City the day preceding the pay day. He stated:
He said the account was balanced within two or three days, and it was understood at the bank they were to carry no balance. That was the prevailing practice and course of business from 1924, to the time the bank closed its doors. Witness stated that under this arrangement they paid two days earlier than the regular Missouri mine pay roll day; that the last credit on the account was on February 21, 1930, in the amount of $7123.11, representing the deposit to cover pay checks that day; that checks aggregating $1448.38, had not been returned to the bank; that the bank had authority to pay money out of this account only on the form of check used for the pay roll, and no other checks were drawn.
If a miner would draw his money before pay day, the witness would draw a check payable to himself as agent.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Killoren v. First Nat. Bank in St. Louis
...fund." The Craig case is cited with approval in Landwehr v. Moberly, 338 Mo. 1106, 93 S.W. 2d 935, and Central Coal & Coke Co. v. State Bank, 226 Mo.App. 594, 44 S.W.2d 188. In Landwehr v. Moberly, supra, the Supreme Court of Missouri had before it a case to establish a preference in a clos......
-
Berkley Ins. Co. v. Hawthorn Bank
...the part of the depositor, that it should become a special deposit is not sufficient to make it so."); and Central Coal 7 Coke Co. v. State Bank, 44 S.W.2d 188, 191 (Mo. App. 1931) (special deposit was established where there was written direction and verbal agreement between the parties th......
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. State Bank of Bevier
-
In re Wellston Trust Co.
...Trust Co. of St. Charles, Mo.App., 68 S. W.2d 919; In re Sturdivant Bank, Mo. App., 89 S.W.2d 89; Central Coal & Coke Co. v. State Bank of Bevier, 226 Mo.App. 594, 44 S.W.2d 188. It follows that the judgment rendered by the circuit court should be affirmed, and the Commissioner so PER CURIA......