Cobas-Torres v. State, COBAS-TORRE

Decision Date10 February 1987
Docket NumberCOBAS-TORRE,A,No. 85-554,85-554
Citation12 Fla. L. Weekly 478,502 So.2d 67
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 478 Luisppellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark J. Berkowitz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court erred in refusing to permit defendant to introduce extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement made by a prosecution witness, § 90.614(2), Fla.Stat. (1983), we deem the error harmless because the evidence of guilt was overwhelming. Mahone v. State, 222 So.2d 769 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1983); cf. Thornes v. State, 485 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 1st DCA) (exclusion of testimony regarding prior inconsistent statement of sole eyewitness to crime not harmless error considering other errors made by trial court), review denied, 492 So.2d 1335 (Fla.1986); see Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 882, 102 S.Ct. 369, 70 L.Ed.2d 195 (1981); see generally State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

We find error, however, in the judgment. The trial judge reclassified defendant's conviction for manslaughter from a second-degree felony, §§ 782.07, 775.082(3)(c), Fla.Stat. (1983), to a first-degree felony pursuant to section 775.087(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1983). The verdict failed to contain specific findings that defendant used or carried a firearm during the commission of the offense; thus, the verdict cannot support the trial court's reclassification. State v. Smith, 462 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1985); State v. Overfelt, 457 So.2d 1385 (Fla.1984); Henry v. State, 483 So.2d 860 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Daniels v. State, 473 So.2d 722 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Lopez v. State, 470 So.2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Streeter v. State, 416 So.2d 1203, 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We therefore reverse the sentence and remand to the trial court for entry of an appropriate judgment and for resentencing.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Marshall v. State, 85-165
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 9, 1988
    ...(Fla.1984); Douglas v. State, 523 So.2d 704 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); LaMarca v. State, 515 So.2d 309 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Cobas-Torres v. State, 502 So.2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Streeter v. State, 416 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Although the verdict did not expressly contain a finding that the......
  • Spellman v. State, BT-64
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 13, 1988
    ...of the robbery, coupled with the ability to carry out such threats. Cf. State v. Overfelt, 457 So.2d 1385 (Fla.1984); Cobas-Torres v. State, 502 So.2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (In the absence of specific findings that defendant used or carried a firearm during the commission of the offense, it......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT