Cobble v. Garrison
Decision Date | 11 April 1949 |
Docket Number | 41021 |
Citation | 219 S.W.2d 393 |
Parties | George Cobble and Katie Cobble, His Wife, Susie A. Smith, Eulis Kenslow, and Minnie Kenslow, His Wife, Wilfred A. Brown and T. A. Brown, Plaintiffs, Eulis Kenslow and Minnie Kenslow, His Wife, Wilfred A. Brown and T. A. Brown, Respondents, v. J. E. Garrison, J. Elmer Kellett and Eliza J. Garrison, Defendants, J. E. Garrison, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
From the Circuit Court of Howell County, Civil Appeal, Judge Gordon Dorris
Affirmed
Action to restrain the foreclosure of a deed of trust; to adjudge the invalidity of the instrument on the ground it was wholly without consideration; and for a decree quieting title. The cause was tried on an amended petition whereby George H Cobble, Katie Cobble and Susie A. Smith, who joined as parties plaintiff in the original petition, were dropped as parties. The trial chancellor found there was "no consideration for the trust deed - and by reason of the non-existence of a debt the trust deed is invalid"; and judgment was rendered in accordance with the prayers of plaintiffs' petition. Defendant J. (John) E. Garrison named beneficiary in the deed of trust, has appealed.
In this case the essential and inherent validity of the deed of trust itself is in dispute, and "title to real estate" is involved in an appellate jurisdictional sense. This court has appellate jurisdiction of the case. Section 3, Article V, Constitution of Missouri, 1945; Nettleton Bank v. McGauhey's Estate, 318 Mo 948, 2 S.W.2d 771; Castorina v. Herrmann, 340 Mo. 1026, 104 S.W.2d 297; Munday v. Austin, Cause No. 40996, decided Court en Banc, February 14, 1949.
The general rule is that a mortgage is not valid and binding unless founded on a sufficient consideration. And the existence of an obligation to be secured is an essential element of a mortgage, or of a deed of trust in the nature of a mortgage. The mortgage has no efficacy if unaccompanied by a debt or obligation. Donovan v. Boeck, 217 Mo. 70, 87, 116 S.W. 543, 547, and cases therein cited; Ebbs v. Neff, 325 Mo. 1182, 30 S.W.2d 616; Mosley v. Cavanagh, 344 Mo. 236, 125 S.W.2d 852; Munday v. Austin, supra; 36 Am. Jur., Mortgages, § 106, pp. 740-741, §§ 57-58, pp. 717-718. A mortgage imports or implies a consideration, and the introduction of the instrument into evidence constitutes prima facie proof it was given by the mortgagor or grantor for a consideration moving to him. Plaintiffs, in their attack on the validity of the deed of trust based on the ground of want of consideration, had the burden of proof. They were entitled to a decree canceling the instrument upon evidence clearly preponderating in their favor on the issue. Von Schleinitz v. North Hotel Co., 323 Mo. 1110, 23 S.W.2d 64; Hamilton v. Steininger, 350 Mo. 698, 168 S.W.2d 59; Munday v. Austin, supra.
Evidence was introduced in the trial of the cause as follows
In 1931 Curtis J. Garrison and Eliza J., his wife, bought the fifty-four acres of land in the deed of trust described from Jessie F. Bean, and we infer Garrison and wife gave a deed of trust back on the land to secure a note representing at least a part of the purchase price.
The deed of trust involved in the instant case was purportedly executed by C. J. Garrison and "Louisa" J. Garrison, September 12, 1941, and acknowledged on that day before one M. M. Freeman, a notary public, who was scrivener of the instrument. The signature of "Louisa" J. was by "her mark." The deed of trust named defendant J. Elmer Kellett as trustee, and defendant-appellant J. E. Garrison, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "defendant," son of Curtis J. and Eliza J., was named the beneficiary. The instrument was conditioned upon the payment of "the debt and interest expressed" in a note for $500, of even date, due in one year, C. J. and "Louisa Jane" Garrison, makers, J. E. Garrison, payee. The deed of trust recited the note was signed by C. J. Garrison and "Louisa Jane" Garrison. The document was recorded April 26, 1945, after the death of Curtis J. Garrison, who died April 1, 1945.
Defendant testified he had taken the deed of trust to the recorder's office in 1944, "and I couldn't get it recorded and I left it with them."
In September 1946, after the recording of the deed of trust, Eliza J. Garrison conveyed the described land to George H. Cobble and wife, and Susie A. Smith. December 5, 1946, the Cobbles and Susie A. Smith conveyed to plaintiff-respondent, Wilfred A. Brown, who, December 10, 1946, conveyed to his father, plaintiff-respondent T. A. Brown. And T. A. Brown, April 14, 1947, reconveyed the land, reserving in himself a life estate, to his son Wilfred A. The Browns testified they had no actual knowledge of the recorded deed of trust. They did not search the records and made no examination of the title. They relied on the statements of their grantors that the land "was clear."
When Curtis J. and Eliza J. were selling the eleven and a fraction acres to Eulis and Minnie Kenslow in 1942, defendant was "handling the deal" for his parents. R. E. Butler and wife were lending the purchase money to the Kenslows. Defendant testified the Kenslows paid him "some money on this land - I turned it over to mother and father." Butler and wife testified defendant stated to them "there wasn't any" deed of trust on the land, "Mr. Garrison (defendant) assured me that there was no indebtedness of any kind." One Forster, Eulis and Minnie Kenslow, and Tim Kenslow, brother of Eulis, testified they had heard defendant make like statements in 1942.
The deposition of defendant Eliza J. Garrison was offered and read into evidence by plaintiffs. She is "up toward 78 years" of age, and cannot read or write. Her testimony is not unequivocal, and indicates a lack of clear recollection of the circumstances of her execution, if so, of the deed of trust involved herein; and, indeed, it seems she may not have known she was signing any instrument in the nature of a mortgage.
On direct examination she stated she had not signed a note or deed of trust "in favor of" defendant. She had "signed one and me and the old man paid that off," it was the one given (to Bean?) when they bought the land. She said she had never owed defendant. "He owes me seven or eight hundred dollars."
sir, I did not.
And she again stated she had not given
M. M Freeman, scrivener of the deed of trust, now a resident of Florida, testified by deposition (offered and read into evidence by defendants) that he lived in West Plains in 1941 - had lived there for many prior years. He had known Curtis J. and Eliza Jane Garrison. He stated "Rad" Garrison (a brother of defendant) was a veteran of World War I, and drew a "pension," he lived with his parents. The witness Freeman is now nearly 80 years old and his mind, he says, is The witness described Eliza J. as "medium-sized and rather slender build, not fleshy - I would guess she weighed around 140 pounds but that is guessing." (There was testimony that Eliza J. has been small and frail for years,...
To continue reading
Request your trial