Cochran v. Pinchak, 02-1047.
| Decision Date | 17 June 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 02-1047.,02-1047. |
| Citation | 412 F.3d 500 |
| Parties | Oliver COCHRAN Appellant v. Steven PINCHAK, Administrator of East Jersey State Prison; Patrick Arvonio, Administrator of East Jersey State Prison; Alfiero Ortiz, Assistant Administrator of East Jersey State Prison; Terrance Moore, Assistant Administrator of East Jersey State Prison; Michael Powers; Dr. Frederick Bauer; Lt. "John" Miller; Sgt. "John" Tarza; Dr. Franklin H. Spirn; Dr. Howard M. Epstein; New Jersey Department of Corrections; Thomas D. Farrell, Supervisor of the Health Services Unit of the New Jersey Department of Corrections; Scott A. Faunce, Administrator of Bayside State Prison; Charles Leone, Assistant Administrator of Bayside State Prison; "Jane" Meritt, Classification Supervisor of Bayside State Prison; "John" Blount, Correction Officer; "John" Alende, Correction Officer; "John" Davenport, Correction Officer; "John" Snell, Correction Officer; Sergeant "John" Perganski, Correction Officer; Sergeant "John" Davis, Correction Officer; Correctional Medical Services; Dr. Hertzel Zackai; Dr. "John" Carlino; Lisa Little, Hospital Administrator for Bayside State Prison; Marge Amodel Appellees UNITED STATES of America Intervenor. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, FISHER and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING
It appearing that the Supreme Court has before it the consolidated cases of United States v. Georgia, No. 04-1203, and Goodman v. Georgia, No. 04-1236, cert granted May 16, 2005, that are appeals from the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit which discuss Miller v. King, 384 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir.2004), a case relied on by the majority opinion in the within case, it is ORDERED that the Petitions for Panel Rehearing be and are hereby GRANTED, that the opinion and judgment in the within case be VACATED and that the matter be held C.A.V. until such time as the Supreme Court decides the consolidated cases of United States v. Georgia, No. 04-1203, and Goodman v. Georgia, No. 04-1236.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Toledo v. Sanchez
...George Mason Univ., 411 F.3d 474, 487 (4th Cir. 2005); Cochran v. Pinchak, 401 F.3d 184, 191 (3d Cir.), vacated pending decision in 412 F.3d 500 (3d Cir.2005); Ass'n for Disabled Americans, Inc. v. Fla. Int'l Univ., 405 F.3d 954, 958 (11th Cir.2005). Indeed, we stated in Badillo-Santiago, M......
-
Mohney v. Pennsylvania
...established with respect to Title II by the Lane Court.” Id. at 554 n. 35 (quoting Cochran v. Pinchak, 401 F.3d 184, 191, vacated, 412 F.3d 500 (3d Cir.2005)) (“ Lane considered evidence of disability discrimination in the administration of public services and programs generally ... and con......
-
John Doe v. Bd. Of Regents Of The Univ. Of Neb. .
...Dept. of HHS Finance and Support, 547 U.S. 1067, 126 S.Ct. 1826, 164 L.Ed.2d 514; Cochran v. Pinchak, 401 F.3d 184 (3d Cir.2005), vacated 412 F.3d 500; Miller v. King, 384 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir.2004), vacated and superseded 449 F.3d 1149 (11th Cir.2006). 99See Keef, supra note 70. 100Id. 101I......
-
Chase v. Baskerville
...(citing Miller, 384 F.3d at 1271 n. 25; Cochran v. Pinchak, 401 F.3d 184, 191 (3d Cir.), rehearing granted and judgment vacated by 412 F.3d 500 (3d Cir.2005)). Thus, the second step of the City of Boerne test is satisfied. C. Step Three: Is Title II a Congruent and Proportional Response in ......
-
Out with the new, in with the old: the importance of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act to prisoners with disabilities.
...rights under the Equal Protection Clause. See Cochran v. Pinchak, 401 F.3d 184, 193 (3d Cir. 2005), vacated by Cochran v. Pinchak, 412 F.3d 500 (3rd Cir. 2005). The Eleventh Circuit similarly held that abrogation was not valid where the issue at stake was a prisoner's right to be free from ......