Cofield v. E. A. Jenkins Motor Co

Decision Date01 August 1911
Citation71 S.E. 969,89 S.C. 419
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesCOFIELD. v. E. A. JENKINS MOTOR CO.

Damages (§ 124*)—Breach of Contract-Measure of Damages.

The measure of damages recoverable by an agent obtaining an exclusive agency within specified territory to sell the motor cars of a manufacturer, allowing him a specified discount from the catalogue prices on cars sold, for the action of the manufacturer in selling cars within the territory, is the specified discount from the catalogue prices of the cars so sold.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Damages, Cent. Dig. §§ 320-338; Dec. Dig. § 124.*]

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Richland County; Geo. E. Prince, Judge.

"To be officially reported."

Action by James Cofield against the E. A. Jenkins Motor Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Robt. Moorman, for appellant.

S. G. Finley and Nelson, Nelson & Gettys, for respondent.

HYDRICK, J. For valuable consideration, defendant gave plaintiff the exclusive agency to sell its motor cars in a certain territory for a specified time, and agreed to allow him a discount of 10 per cent. from the catalogue prices on all cars sold. During the life of the contract, defendant, knowing that it was acting in violation of its terms, sold four cars in plaintiff's territory worth, at catalogue prices, $5,300. Held, in an action for breach of the contract, that the measure of plaintiff's damages was 10 per cent. of the catalogue prices of the cars so sold by defendant.

Affirmed.

JONES, C. J., and GARY, A. J., concur.

*.For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep'r Indexes

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • B. Bluethenhal Co. v. McDougal
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 25, 1932
    ... ... invaded territory ... Sparks ... v. Reliable Dayton Motor Car Co., 85 Kan. 29, 116 P. 363, ... Ann. Cas. 1912C, 1251; Brach & Sons v. Stewart, 104 ... Cas. 1914A ... 803; Taylor v. Bradley, 39 N.Y. 129, 100 Am. Dec ... 415; Cofield v. E. A. Jenkins Motor Co., 89 So. Car. 419, 71 ... S.E. 969 ... The ... loss of ... ...
  • Hutson v. Stone
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1922
    ... ... to do so. Vreeland v. Vetterlein, 33 N. J. Law, 247; ... see Cofield v. Jenkins Motor Co., 89 S.C. 419, 71 ... S.E. 969. But where a number of agents are openly and ... ...
  • Lewis-Hale Coal Co. v. Enterprise Fuel Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 1, 1929
    ...Bredemeier v. Pacific Supply Co., 64 Or. 576, 131 P. 312; Harter Medicine Co. v. Hopkins, 83 Wis. 309, 53 N. W. 501; Cofield v. Jenkins Motor Co., 89 S. C. 419, 71 S. E. 969; Eastern Motor Sales v. Apperson-Lee, etc., Co., 117 Va. 495, 85 S. E. 479. It cannot be fairly said that the shipmen......
  • Cofield v. E. A. Jenkins Motor Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • August 1, 1911

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT