Cohen v. Cohen
Decision Date | 19 March 1951 |
Citation | 200 Misc. 19 |
Parties | Ruth Cohen, Plaintiff,<BR>v.<BR>Louis Cohen, Defendant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court |
Louis Fine for plaintiff.
No appearance for defendant.
FERDINAND PECORA, Official Referee.
By an order dated January 5, 1951, the above-entitled proceeding was referred to me to hear and report.
The proof was taken before me on the 20th day of February, 1951; on which proof and exhibits received in evidence, filed herewith and made a part hereof, I do hereby report as follows:
Presented, in this action by a wife for absolute divorce, is the question whether an act of sodomy alleged to have been committed by defendant constitutes an act of adultery. Plaintiff has proven that she married defendant in 1930, and that there is a son, seventeen and one-half years of age, issue of the marriage. The complaint alleges: "That on or about the 20th day of March, 1946, the defendant herein committed adultery with a person unknown to plaintiff in the Township of Mahwah, County of Bergen, State of New Jersey." In support of that allegation, plaintiff offered in evidence the record of defendant's conviction, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of sodomy, in the Bergen County Court of Quarter Sessions, New Jersey, on June 21, 1946. Defendant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than seven nor more than ten years in the New Jersey State Prison. The indictment indicates that defendant was charged with having committed the crime of sodomy upon a male person.
In Ackerman v. Ackerman (200 N.Y. 72, 76) the court said: ( .)
The statutes of this State assign only one ground for divorce, i.e., adultery (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1147). Whether the commission of an act of sodomy may constitute adultery is a question which does not seem to have been decided by the courts of this or any other State. (See 1 Bishop on Marriage, Divorce and Separation, § 1832, p. 756.) Adultery is defined in the Penal Law a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Johnson
...status; dictum). Putting aside the question of whether adultery encompasses only heterosexual intercourse (cf. Cohen v. Cohen, 200 Misc. 19, 103 N.Y.S.2d 426 (Sup.Ct. 1961); N.Y.Domestic Relations Law, McKinney's Consol.Laws, c. 14, § 170(4) (Supp.1967) (newly defining adultery to include h......
-
S.B. v. S.J.B.
...In New York an act of homosexual sodomy was held to not constitute an act of adultery entitling a wife to a divorce. Cohen v. Cohen 103 N.Y.S.2d 426, 200 Misc. 19 (1951). The Court ruled that "carnal knowledge" is not the same as sexual intercourse and that therefore no action for divorce c......
-
Doe v. Doe, 0550
...wife, whose vagina was completely occluded, based on her performance on another man of "unnatural sex acts" [sic]; Cohen v. Cohen, 200 Misc. 19, 103 N.Y.S.2d 426 (Sup.Ct.1951) (held wife not entitled to divorce from husband on ground of adultery based on his confession of "sodomy upon a mal......
-
Baker v. Baker
...Anonymous, 2 Ohio N. P. 342; Crutcher v. Crutcher, 86 Miss. 231, 38 So. 337; Poler v. Poler, 32 Wash. 400, 72 P. 372; Cohen v. Cohen, 200 Misc. 19, 103 N.Y.S.2d 426; Keezer, Marriage and Divorce (3d ed.), s. 487, p. 525; Schouler Divorce Manual, s. 90, p. 119; 27 C.J.S. Divorce § 28, p. 559......