Colarusso v. Colarusso

Decision Date21 October 2009
Docket NumberNo. 3D09-1633.,3D09-1633.
Citation20 So.3d 985
PartiesChristopher COLARUSSO, Petitioner, v. Brenna Myers COLARUSSO, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Deborah Marks, Miami, for petitioner.

Rosenthal Rosenthal Rasco Kaplan and Liliana Loebl, Aventura, for respondent.

Before WELLS, SHEPHERD and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Christopher Colarusso seeks a writ of prohibition preventing the trial judge from conducting further proceedings in the petitioner's dissolution of marriage case. "A motion to recuse or disqualify a trial judge is legally sufficient when the alleged facts would create in a reasonably prudent person a well-founded fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial." Valdes-Fauli v. Valdes-Fauli, 903 So.2d 214, 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). A review of the verified motion to disqualify demonstrates that it is legally sufficient. The judge's decidedly negative commentary concerning his personal opinion of the petitioner's behavior, when viewed in the context of, and at this stage of, the dissolution proceeding, is sufficient to create in a reasonably prudent person a well-founded fear that he would not receive a fair hearing before this judge. See Miami Dade College v. Turnberry Inv., Inc., 979 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Valdes-Fauli, 903 So.2d at 214; Kopel v. Kopel, 832 So.2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Doe, 767 So.2d 626 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Tindle v. Tindle, 761 So.2d 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Accordingly, we grant the petition. We are certain that it will be unnecessary to issue a formal writ.

Petition granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Molina v. Perez
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 9, 2016
    ...alleged comments could reasonably have caused her to "fear that she would not receive a fair trial." As stated in Colarusso v. Colarusso, 20 So.3d 985, 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), "[t]he judge's decidedly negative commentary concerning his personal opinion of the petitioner's behavior, when vie......
  • Shabtai v. Shabtai
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 30, 2023
    ... ... v ... Dep't of Child. & Fams., 298 So.3d 1184, 1185 ... (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (quoting Colarusso v. Colarusso, ... 20 So.3d 985, 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)). "The allegations ... of fact that are contained in the motion must be taken as ... ...
  • Cisneros v. Guinand
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 20, 2021
    ...and impartial trial." S.S. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 298 So. 3d 1184, 1185 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (quoting Colarusso v. Colarusso, 20 So. 3d 985, 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) ; Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d)(1) ). "The allegations of fact that are contained in the motion must be taken as true, M......
  • Martinez v. Cramer
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 3, 2013
    ...lead any reasonably prudent person to fear that she would not receive a fair hearing before the judge. See, e.g., Colarusso v. Colarusso, 20 So.3d 985, 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). Although respondent contends that a judge's comments in the course of attempting to control the courtroom are ordin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Trial and evidence
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Family Law and Practice - Volume 1
    • April 30, 2022
    ...a material witness for or against one of the parties to the cause. [Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.330(d); Colarusso v. Colarusso , 20 So. 3d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (judge’s decidedly negative commentary concerning his personal opinion of the petitioner’s behavior, when viewed in the co......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT