Cold Storage Cafe, Inc. v. Barone, 2D99-2291.
| Decision Date | 12 May 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 2D99-2291.,2D99-2291. |
| Citation | 779 So.2d 371 |
| Parties | COLD STORAGE CAFÉ, INC., Appellant, v. Jennifer BARONE, Richard H. Sollner, as Trustee of Land Trust Number 1, and Robert Hine, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Daniel J. Lynott, Tampa, for Appellant.
Daniel F. Pilka, Brandon, for Appellee Sollner.
No Appearance for Appellees Barone and Hine.
Appellee Jennifer Barone was injured by flying shattered glass when appellee Robert Hine struck a large window on the premises of the Cold Storage Café, a bar and restaurant on Florida Avenue in downtown Tampa. The café was owned and operated by appellant Cold Storage Café, Inc. (Cold Storage), who leased the premises from appellee Richard H. Sollner as Trustee of Land Trust Number 1. Ms. Barone filed a personal injury and premises liability lawsuit naming as defendants Mr. Hine, Cold Storage, and Mr. Sollner in his trustee capacity. Mr. Sollner moved for summary judgment on liability claiming he had no responsibility for Ms. Barone's injuries because he had leased the premises and retained no possessory interest or control of them. The trial court entered summary judgment in Mr. Sollner's favor. In order to preserve its rights, see Holton v. H.J. Wilson, Co., 482 So.2d 341 (Fla.1986),
Cold Storage stepped into Ms. Barone's shoes and brings this appeal from the summary judgment in favor of its codefendant, Mr. Sollner. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(k). We reverse.
Cold Storage claims that there remain disputed issues of material fact concerning whether it or Mr. Sollner, under the provisions of the lease, was responsible for maintaining the window. Generally the lease gives to Mr. Sollner the responsibility for the "exterior of the leased property" and to Cold Storage the responsibility to maintain the "interior of the leased property." The terms "exterior" and "interior" are not defined in the lease. Cold Storage argued that because the window was part of an exterior wall, it was Mr. Sollner's responsibility to maintain, even though in the past Cold Storage had always cleaned all windows and, when the need arose, replaced broken ones.
At the very least there are ambiguities in the lease and the parties' disputed interpretations of the lease provisions created issues of fact that precluded summary judgment, despite evidence that in the past Cold Storage had cleaned and replaced windows. See Hervey v. Alfonso, 650 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Marriott International, Inc. v. Perez-Melendez
...a duty to their invitees to exercise reasonable care to maintain their premises in a safe condition."). 5. Cold Storage Cafe, Inc. v. Barone, 779 So.2d 371, 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("The issue of whether a negligent condition exists on premises generally involves, as here, a disputed materia......
-
Smith v. Grove Apartments, LLC
...trial court reversibly erred when it entered final summary judgment in favor of the landlord in this case. See Cold Storage Café, Inc. v. Barone, 779 So.2d 371 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (whether the condition of the window on the leased premises on the date of the accident was dangerous, e.g., bec......
-
Poe v. IMC PHOSPHATES MP, INC.
...exists on premises generally involves a disputed issue of material fact which precludes summary judgment. Cold Storage Cafe, Inc. v. Barone, 779 So.2d 371, 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Genuine issues of fact in the record give rise to two distinct legal theories of IMC's liability, thus precludi......
-
Chavez v. Mcdonald's Rest. of Fla., Inc.
...in a safe condition.”); McCain v. Fla. Power Corp., 593 So.2d 500 (Fla.1992); Wolford, 861 So.2d at 456–57;Cold Storage Cafe, Inc. v. Barone, 779 So.2d 371, 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (“The issue of whether a negligent condition exists on premises generally involves, as here, a disputed materia......