Cole v. Chief of Police of Fall River
Decision Date | 04 December 1942 |
Citation | 312 Mass. 523,45 N.E.2d 400 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Parties | HAROLD E. COLE v. CHIEF OF POLICE OF FALL RIVER & others. |
November 10, 1942.
Present: FIELD, C.
J., DONAHUE, QUA COX, & RONAN, JJ.
Supreme Judicial Court, Moot question. Equity Pleading and Practice, Decree.
The issues in a suit in equity commenced by a candidate for public office several months before a primary preceding the election, to enjoin the police authorities of a city from threatened interference with certain political advertising by the plaintiff on the ground that it was in violation of a city ordinance, had become moot when the case reached this court after the plaintiff had been defeated at the primary and the candidate of his party had been defeated at the election although he intended to use the advertising in the city in future political campaigns.
Upon appeal from a final decree dismissing the bill in a suit in equity, where the issues involved in the suit appeared to have become moot by the time the case was reached in this court, the decree should be modified by inserting a provision that the bill was dismissed on that ground, and as so modified the decree was affirmed.
BILL IN EQUITY filed in the Superior Court on June 4, 1942. The suit was heard by Williams, J., upon a case stated. Final decrees dismissing the bill were entered on July 27, 1942. The plaintiff appealed.
An affidavit filed by the plaintiff in this court contained the following, among other statement:
H. E. Cole, pro se. R. C. Westgate, for the defendants.
The plaintiff, a candidate for the office of representative in Congress from the Fourteenth Congressional District of Massachusetts, equipped an automobile and trailer, both registered in his name, with signs directing attention to the record of his opponent and informing the public that he was a candidate for the office. The trailer carried a large board approximately fifteen feet long and seven feet wide, on each of the two faces of which was a sign attacking the public record of his opponent. The automobile bore a sign approximately four feet long and three feet high which announced the candidacy of the plaintiff and referred to his opponent as an ex-congressman. On the morning of May 30 1942, while the automobile and trailer were being operated along a public street in Fall River by an agent of the plaintiff, the said agent was informed by the defendant Verville, a captain in the police department of Fall River, that he was...
To continue reading
Request your trial