Coleman v. Champion Intern. Inc., 88-3154

Decision Date30 November 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-3154,88-3154
Citation552 So.2d 1196,14 Fla. L. Weekly 2750
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 2750 Norris COLEMAN, Appellant, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL INC. and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Frank E. Maloney, Jr., Macclenny, for appellant.

Richard M. Stoudemire of Howell, Liles & Milton, Jacksonville, for appellees.

JOANOS, Judge.

Norris Coleman has appealed from an order of a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying in part his claim for temporary partial disability benefits. We reverse.

Coleman was working two full-time jobs at the time he was injured, as a school custodian and as a laborer for Champion International (Champion). On August 8, 1986, he injured his hand during his employment with Champion. Coleman returned to work on September 9, 1986, but only with the school. He remained in this employment posture until October 13, 1986, when his doctor returned him to full activity. Although he continued his custodial work after October 13, Coleman did not thereafter return to work for Champion, nor seek a second job elsewhere. It is undisputed that, at the time Coleman was medically released to full activity, Champion did not inform him of his obligation to perform a job search and submit wage-loss forms to preserve his eligibility for benefits.

Champion had ceased paying benefits when Coleman returned to the custodial job. The JCC held him entitled to Temporary Total Disability (TTD) benefits from September 9 to September 16, 1986, and to Temporary Partial Disability (TPD) benefits thereafter until October 13, 1986, finding that his employment during this period was sheltered, and that there was therefore no voluntary limitation of income. However, the JCC went on to find that Coleman's failure either to return to work for Champion, or look for another second job, after the October 13 medical release to full activity, constituted a voluntary limitation of income. TPD benefits were therefore denied after that date.

It is well-settled that a work search is not a prerequisite to receipt of benefits where the employer/carrier fail to advise the claimant of his obligation to perform a work search. Ninia v. Southwest Bottlers, 547 So.2d 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). This is true despite the employee's knowledge that the treating physician has released him to full activity. See Griffith v. McDonald's, 526 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (the workers' compensation system is an employer/carrier monitored system,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Nickolls v. University of Florida
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 4, 1992
    ...Corp. of Am., 559 So.2d 399 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Parker v. Eaton Corp., 554 So.2d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Coleman v. Champion Int'l, Inc., 552 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Mackin v. Olde World Cheese Shop, 536 So.2d 301 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Rios v. Fred Teitelbaum Constr., 522 So.2d 101......
  • City of Miami v. Jacoby
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 29, 1992
    ...Corp. of Am., 559 So.2d 399 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Parker v. Eaton Corp., 554 So.2d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA1989); Coleman v. Champion Int'l Inc., 552 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA1989); Mackin v. Olde World Cheese Shop, 536 So.2d 301 (Fla. 1st DCA1988); Rios v. Fred Teitelbaum Constr., 522 So.2d 1015 (F......
  • Pan American World Airways v. Mash, 89-02612
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 15, 1991
    ...to the date of MMI, and wage-loss benefits thereafter. The E/SA concede that this court's holding in Coleman v. Champion International, Inc., 552 So.2d 1196, 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), would allow such an award. In Coleman, this court held that the performance of a work search is not a prere......
  • McDowell v. Florida Power Corp., 94-0071
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 1995
    ...Inc., 634 So.2d 292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Turner v. Rinker Materials, 622 So.2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Coleman v. Champion International, Inc., 552 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); DeFrees v. Colt & Dumont, 483 So.2d 848 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Insofar as the denial of wage loss benefits from M......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT