Coleman v. Schwarzenegger
| Citation | 922 F.Supp.2d 882 |
| Decision Date | 04 August 2009 |
| Docket Number | Nos. CIV S–90–0520 LKK JFM P, C01–1351 TEH.,s. CIV S–90–0520 LKK JFM P, C01–1351 TEH. |
| Parties | Ralph COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. Marciano Plata, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al., Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Edward P. Sangster, Raymond E. Loughrey, Jeffrey L. Bornstein, K & L Gates, LLP, Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld, Lisa Adrienne Ells, Aaron Joseph Fischer, Blake Thompson, Ernest Galvan, Jane E. Kahn, Krista Michelle Stone-Manista, Laura Barbara Boysen-Aragon, Lori Rifkin, Michael Bien, Michael Louis Freedman, Thomas Bengt Nolan, Kenneth M. Walczak, Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld, LLP, Amy Whelan, Claudia B. Center, Legal Aid Society, San Francisco, Donald Specter, Rebekah B. Evenson, Berkeley, Kimberly Hall Barlow, Jones & Mayer, Fullerton, Fred D. Heather Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs, Howard, Avchen & Shapiro, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs.
Debbie Jean Vorous, William H. Downer, Rochelle C. East, Patrick R. McKinney, Neah Huynh, Attorney General's Office for the State Of California, David Eugene Brice, Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Kyle Anthony Lewis, Office of the Attorney General for the State of California, Danielle Felice O'Bannon, Department of Justice, Jay Craig Russell Thomas Stuart Patterson, Office of the California Attorney General, Maneesh Sharma, CA Dept Of Justice, Samantha Derin Wolff, Hanson Bridgett, LLP, San Francisco, Paul B. Mello, Hanson Bridgett, LLP, Walnut Creek, Michael R. Capizzi, Law Office of Michael R. Capizzi, Santa Ana, Kimberly Hall Barlow, Ones & Mayer, Fullerton, CA, for Defendants.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Kavanaugh
...system caused the state to deliver constitutionally-inadequate medical and mental health care to inmates. ( Coleman v. Schwarzenegger (E.D. Cal. & N.D. Cal. 2009) 922 F.Supp.2d 882, affd. sub nom. Brown v. Plata (2011) 563 U.S. 493, 131 S.Ct. 1910, 179 L.Ed.2d 969.) In connection with this ......
-
B.M. v. Superior Court
...had become "criminogenic," meaning they contribute to, not minimize, the occurrence of crime. ( Coleman v. Schwarzenegger (E.D.Cal. & N.D.Cal. 2009) 922 F.Supp.2d 882, 973 ( Coleman ).) Proposition 57's proponents made a similar argument, pointing out that keeping minors in the juvenile sys......
-
People v. Valencia
...and ordered the state to reduce its prison population to 137.5 percent of design capacity within two years. ( Coleman v. Schwarzenegger (E.D.Cal. 2009) 922 F.Supp.2d 882, 949 ; see also id. at pp. 969–970.) In May 2011, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the three-judge court's remedi......
-
Rico v. Ducart
...officials to implement certain measures to reduce inmate suicides in solitary confinement cells. See Coleman v. Schwarzenegger , 922 F. Supp. 2d 882, 902 n.19 (E.D. & N.D. Cal. 2009). Since 2013, these measures included directives to correctional officers to conduct welfare checks on inmate......
-
Shoreline Armoring and the Public Trust Doctrine: Balancing Public and Private Interests as Seas Rise
...environmental agencies from mismanaging public trust assets.”). 313. See supra Part IV.B.2.; see also Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, 922 F. Supp. 2d 882, 962 (N.D. Cal. 2009) (concluding that the average of the plaintif and defendants’ estimates of the prison capacity would “provide the relief ......
-
THE HOUSE ALWAYS WINS: DOCTRINE AND ANIMUS IN CALIFORNIA'S COVID-19 PRISON LITIGATION.
...2932253, at *1, *33 (N.D. Cal. 2005). (33.) Hines v. Youseff, 914 F.3d 1218, 1223-25 (9th Cir. 2019). (34.) Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, 922 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. & N.D. Cal. 2009). (35.) HADAR AVIRAM, CHEAP ON CRIME: RECESSION-ERA POLITICS AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN PUNISHMENT 53......
-
Part two: case summaries by major topic.
...Rehabilitation) CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT U.S. District Court CROWDING FAILURE TO PROVIDE CARE MEDICAL CARE Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, 922 F.Supp.2d 882 (E.D.Cal. 2009). State prisoners brought class actions against a governor and other officials, alleging unconstitutional conditions of con......
-
Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 15, § 2054 Exceptions to Videoconference Presumption For Proceedings
...3042, 3043 and 3550, Penal Code; Clark v. California (N.D. Cal. 2010) 739 F.Supp.2d 1168; Coleman v. Schwarzenegger (E.D. Cal. 2009) 922 F.Supp.2d 882; and Armstrong v. Wilson (9th Cir. 1997) 124 F.3d...
-
California Register, 2022, Number 24. June 17, 2022
...2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 17913); and Plata v. Newsom (N.D. Cal., No. 3:01–cv– 01351–TEH); Coleman v. Schwarzenegger (E.D. Cal. 2009) 922 F.Supp.2d 882; and In re J.G. (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th SPECIFIC AGENCY STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS There are no other statutory requirements specific to the board o......