Collette v. Rebori
Decision Date | 18 October 1904 |
Citation | 82 S.W. 552,107 Mo. App. 711 |
Parties | COLLETTE v. REBORI et al. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; Jas. T. Neville, Judge.
Action by Walter C. Collette against A. Rebori and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
T. J. Delaney, for appellant. Vaughan & Coltrane, for respondents.
Statement.
Omitting caption and the specifications of the injury and damages, the petition on which the cause was tried is as follows: Plaintiff's evidence shows that in 1902 defendant Rebori was a fruit dealer in the city of Springfield, Mo., and had in his employ as collecting agent, etc., Charles Sansone; that plaintiff was at the same time engaged in keeping a grocery store in said city, and made monthly purchases of fruit from Rebori; that Rebori's bookkeeper made a mistake by charging a bill of $2.25 for November purchases made by plaintiff to one Costello instead of to plaintiff. After the payment by plaintiff of his December bill, as rendered by Rebori, the error of the bookkeeper was discovered, and Sansone wrote a note to plaintiff, asking him to call at Rebori's place of business and settle his November account. On December 22d the plaintiff, in response to the note, called at Rebori's place of business. He was unacquainted with either Rebori or Sansone, and addressed the latter as Rebori, taking him to be Rebori. He claimed to Sansone that his bills were paid, and exhibited a receipted bill for his December purchases, and said to Sansone, "I have a receipt for this." Sansone became angry, called plaintiff a liar, and applied other opprobrious epithets to him, ending by ordering him out of the house. Rebori was near by, and heard what was said, but said nothing himself. Plaintiff went out, walked a short distance away, reflected over what had transpired, and concluded he would go back, and see if he could not make an amicable settlement of the matter in dispute. As to what transpired on his return he testified as follows: Plaintiff also testified that Rebori was in the room when Sansone made the assault. One of the witnesses, however, testified that Rebori was not in the store, but outside...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Gosselin v. Trimble
... ... the act is not within the scope of his employment and the ... master is not liable. Collette v. Rebori, 107 ... Mo.App. 711; Grattan v. Suedmeyer, 144 Mo.App. 719; ... Brown v. Ice Co., 178 Mass. 108, 86 Am. St. 469; ... McDermott v. Am ... ...
-
Conway v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
... ... 144; Haehl v. Railroad ... Co., 119 Mo. 325, 339, 340; Gratton v ... Snedmeyer, 144 Mo.App. 719, 723-4; Colletti v ... Rebori, 107 Mo.App. 711, 717, 718; Farber v. Mo. P ... Ry. Co., 116 Mo. 81, 94; State ex rel. Gosselin v ... Trimble, 328 Mo. 760, 41 S.W.2d 801; ... ...
-
Thompson v. Portland Hotel Co.
... ... the defendant Tourse complained of were not within the scope ... of his employment by this defendant as a matter of law ... Collette v. Rebori, 107 Mo.App. 711; Grattan v ... Suedmeyer, 144 Mo.App. 719; Milton v. Railway ... Co., 193 Mo. 46; Excelsior Products Co. v ... ...
-
Rohrmoser v. Household Finance Corp.
... ... Western Union Tel. Co., 270 Mo. 676 (Mo ... en banc); Ritchey v. Western Union Tel. Co., 41 ... S.W.2d 628 (K. C. Ct. App.); Collette v. Rebori, 107 ... Mo.App. 711 (St. L. Ct. App.); Shelby v. Metropolitan ... Street Railway Co., 141 Mo.App. 514 (K. C. Ct. App.); ... ...