Colligan v. Colligan, 3D99-1006.
Citation | 759 So.2d 688 |
Decision Date | 12 April 2000 |
Docket Number | No. 3D99-1006.,3D99-1006. |
Parties | Joseph COLLIGAN, Appellant, v. Norma COLLIGAN, Appellee. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant.
Roberta Fox, and Douglas H. Stein, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and RAMIREZ, JJ.
We find that this is what occurred in the instant case and, therefore, reverse and remand for recalculation.
Upon remand, the trial court is free to reevaluate its prior ruling on alimony in light of the new distribution of assets.
Reversed and remanded.
Appellant Joseph Colligan, the former husband, has moved for rehearing correctly pointing out that we failed to address in our opinion filed on April 12, 2000 the second issue he raised on appeal. That issue was that the trial court erred when it entered an income deduction order to secure the payment of a property distribution award. We grant rehearing and agree that such an order was improper, thus reversing on this point as well.
In Nash v. Nash, 688 So.2d 428, 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), reversing the entry of the income deduction order solely for...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Board of Trustees of Orlando Police Pension Plan v. Langford
...2001) (income deduction order garnishing husband's wages reversed when used to effectuate equitable distribution); Colligan v. Colligan, 759 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (income deduction order cannot be used to effectuate equitable distribution). This court has cited Vizcaino only tangenti......
-
Carollo v. Carollo
...to achieve an equitable distribution of marital assets. Silversmith v. Silversmith, 797 So.2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Colligan v. Colligan, 759 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(recognizing that income deduction order pursuant to section 61.1301, Florida Statutes, is limited to collection of chi......
-
Silversmith v. Silversmith
...for purposes of effectuating the trial court's plan for equitable distribution. See § 61.1301, Fla. Stat.(2000); see also Colligan v. Colligan, 759 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3DCA 2000); Nash v. Nash, 688 So.2d 428, 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Board of Pension Trustees of the City General Employees Pensio......
-
Equitable distribution and property issues
...effectuate equitable distribution is not enforceable by contempt and cannot be subject of income deduction order); Colligan v. Colligan, 759 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (equalizing sum for equitable distribution cannot be ordered to be paid by income deduction order); Abramovic v. Abramov......