Collins v. Broom

Decision Date13 December 1917
Docket Number8694.
Citation94 S.E. 645,21 Ga.App. 420
PartiesCOLLINS v. BROOM.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

"This court by the constitutional amendment creating it is limited in jurisdiction to the correction of errors in law alone, and therefore has no power to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is strongly contrary to the weight of the evidence, if there is any evidence at all to support it." Edge v. Thomas, 9 Ga.App. 559, 71 S.E. 875; Randall v. Bell, 12 Ga.App. 614, 77 S.E. 1132; Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga.App. 24, 90 S.E. 732; McCarty v. Keys, 19 Ga.App. 494, 91 S.E. 875.

The motion for new trial embraced the usual general grounds only. There was ample evidence to support the verdict, and the court properly refused a new trial.

Error from City Court of Savannah; Davis Freeman, Judge.

Action between Lula Collins and Allen Broom. Judgment for the latter, and the former brings error. Affirmed.

H. G. Dukes, of Savannah, and J. P. Dukes, of Pembroke, for plaintiff in error.

W. R. Hewlett and Robt. L. Colding, both of Savannah, for defendant in error.

BLOODWORTH, J.

Judgment affirmed.

BROYLES, P.J., and HARWELL, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT