Collins v. City of Seattle

Decision Date17 July 1885
Citation2 Wash.Terr. 354,7 P. 857
PartiesCOLLINS v. CITY OF SEATTLE.
CourtWashington Supreme Court

McGilvra & Burke, for plaintiff in error.

C. H. Hanford, for defendant in error.

WINGARD, J.

The appeal to this court was taken under the act of 1883. There is no certificate of the judge to the statement of facts that said statement contains all the material facts in the cause, nor the material facts in the cause. The motion to strike it from the record is therefore sustained. There is no assignment of errors in this case served upon the adverse party or his attorney, nor can the paper claimed to be such assignment be considered as a paper in the case. The motion to affirm the judgment is therefore allowed.

For the reasons given in Wilson v. Wald, infra, announced this morning, July 17, 1885, we think there has not been a general appearance in the cause.

HOYT and TURNER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Budd v. Walla Walla Printing & Pub. Co.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 24 Julio 1885
    ... ... 64; Railway Co ... v. McCarthy, 96 U.S. 258; Gelpcke ... v. City of Dubuque, 1 Wall. 221 ... From ... these points, therefore, we pass to the ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT