Collins v. Collins
Decision Date | 06 June 1929 |
Docket Number | 21325. |
Citation | 152 Wash. 499,278 P. 186 |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | COLLINS et al. v. COLLINS et al. |
Appeal from Superior Court, King County; Calvin S. Hall, Judge.
Suit by Angie B. Collins and others, as executors and trustees under the last will and testament of John Collins, deceased against Angie B. Collins and others, for a construction of the will. From the judgment, defendant Emma Collins Downey appeals. Affirmed.
James B. Howe and Farrell, Meier & Meagher, all of Seattle, for appellant.
Chadwick McMicken, Ramsey & Rupp and Donworth, Todd & Holman, all of Seattle, for respondents.
This action was brought to construe the last will and testament of John Collins, deceased. The plaintiffs were the executors and trustees named in the will. The defendants were the beneficiaries. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a judgment construing the will, from which the defendant Emma Collins Downey appeals.
John Collins died April 23, 1903. His last will was executed December 23, 1901, and after his death way duly admitted to probate. The respondent Angie B. Collins, the widow of the deceased, qualified as one of the executors and trustees under the will, as did also the other persons named therein. The part of the will which is here material is as follows:
The respondent Angie B. Collins and John Collins were married in the year 1877. All the surviving children were the result of this marriage, except the appellant Emma Collins Downey, who was the daughter of the deceased by a former marriage. The property described in the will as the Occidental block, now known as the Seattle Hotel property, was acquired by the deceased partly before his marriage to Angie B. Collins and partly after the marriage. April 7, 1903, after the execution of the will, Angie B. Collins by quitclaim deed conveyed all of her interest in the above-mentioned property to her husband.
April 9, 1903, or two days later, John Collins by warranty deed conveyed an undivided one-half interest in that property to Angie B. Collins, his wife, in consideration of $10 and love and affection. The will provides that the estate shall be closed and distributed October 29, 1913, when the youngest child became of age. This was not done, partly because the distributees could not agree and probably in part because all the parties thought it unwise to close and distribute the estate and segregate their interests at that time. In 1925 the executors and trustees brought this action for the purpose above stated.
The controversy is between Emma Collins Downey and the respondent Angie B. Collins, the widow. The appellant claims that she is entitled to a one-sixth interest in the property involved while Mrs. Collins claims one half of the property in her own right and that Mrs. Downey is only entitled to a one-sixth interest in the other half. The question is whether Mrs. Collins was required to elect whether she would take...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
deElche v. Jacobsen, 46715-3
...the separate tort debt be recoverable only out of the liable spouse's "half" of each item of community property? See Collins v. Collins, 152 Wash. 499, 278 P. 186 (1929); In re Estate of Patton, 6 Wash.App. 464, 494 P.2d 238 (1972). How, procedurally, could levy against half of an item of c......
-
Patton's Estate, In re
...can dispose of only his half of the community property, so that such disposition must relate to his own property only. Collins v. Collins, 152 Wash. 499, 278 P. 186 (1929). But such presumption 5 is rebutted by our interpretation of the will and the undisputed evidence. Having so held as to......
-
Norris v. Norris
...and accepting benefits of the will constitute an election of its provisions under the law of this state. Collins v. Collins, 152 Wash. 499, 278 P. 186 (1929) (surviving spouse precluded from claiming community property interest in realty by acting as deceased spouse's executrix and acceptin......
-
Cummings v. Sherman
... ... conclusion finds support in the following cases: Prince v ... Prince, supra; McCullough v. McCullough, supra; Collins ... v. Collins, 152 Wash. 499, 278 P. 186; Tacoma ... Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Nadham, Wash., 128 P.2d 982; ... Cotton v. Town ... ...