Collins v. Compton
| Decision Date | 31 March 1862 |
| Parties | LUKE COLLINS, Respondent, v. BENJAMIN S. COMPTON, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. Judgment affirmed, no exceptions being presented.
Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner's Court.
O. H. Platt, for respondent.
This case is brought by appeal from the law commissioner's court. It does not appear that any exception was taken in that court to any part of its action in the case. Even the motion for a new trial is only for the alleged finding against the evidence.
Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent. damages;
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
State ex rel. Loving v. Trimble
...could not be reviewed on appeal. Cockran v. Britton, 14 Mo. 446; Sickles v. Abbott, 21 Mo. 443; Ames v. Bircher, 22 Mo. 586; Collins v. Compton, 31 Mo. 529; Mehl v. Waldorf, 35 Mo. 466; Jameson v. State, 45 Mo. 332; Wortman v. Campbell, 48 Mo. 509; Berry v. Smith, 54 Mo. 148; Czezewzka v. B......
-
State ex rel. Loving v. Trimble
...City Court of Appeals for review. Cockran v. Britton, 14 Mo. 446; Sickles v. Abbott, 21 Mo. 443; Ames v. Bircher, 22 Mo. 586; Collins v. Compton, 31 Mo. 529; Mehl v. Waldorf, 35 Mo. 466; Jameson v. State, 45 Mo. 332; Wortman v. Campbell, 48 Mo. 509; Berry v. Smith, 54 Mo. 148; Czezewzka v. ......
-
Harris v. Sanders
...the judgment. There was no exception made to the judgment of the court below in sustaining the demurrer in the present suit--Collins v. Compton, 31 Mo. 529; Davis v. Colt, 31 Mo. 530. WAGNER, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court. At the May term, 1862, of the Montgomery Circuit Court t......
- Bank of Missouri v. Bredow