Collins v. Skaggs

Decision Date19 May 1931
Docket Number(No. 6879)
Citation110 W.Va. 518
PartiesElizabeth Collins v. J. S. Skaggs
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
1. iNSTRUCTIONSi

The trial court may refuse an instruction presenting a theory of the case substantially covered by instruction or instructions already granted.

2. Damages-

The law furnishes no measure of damages for pain and suffering. In such case, the decision of the jury upon the amount is generally conclusive, unless it is so large or small as to induce the belief that the jury was influenced by passion, partiality, corruption, or prejudice or misled by some mistaken view of the case.

Error to Circuit Court, Raleigh County.

Action by Elizabeth Collins against J. S. Skaggs for malpractice. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

Geo. D. Moore, for plaintiff in error.

D. D. Ashworth and Clay S. Grouse, for defendant in error.

Litz, President:

Plaintiff, Elizabeth Collins, recovered judgment against defendant, J. S. Skaggs, in the sum of $500.00 for malpractice.

The defendant, a reputable physician, is engaged in rendering necessary medical aid to the families of employees of several coal companies in Raleigh County. On or about March 1, 1930, plaintiff's husband (E. D, Collins) while employed as a miner for one of said companies, reported to Dr. Skaggs that his wife and children were suffering from colds or influenza. The doctor thereupon gave Collins, for their treatment, a bottle of cough syrup and 15 or 20 tablets in a small envelop with directions to take one every hour or half hour. Collins promptly returned home with the medicine. Soon after his arrival his wife took one of the tablets and in ten or fifteen minutes thereafter became so sick that she had to be helped to her bed. Collins immediately returned to Doctor Skaggs with the remaining tablets, reporting the occurrence. The doctor, on examining the same, found that he had, through mistake, given postassium permanganate instead of calcidine. He immediately called at the Collins home and administered to Mrs. Collins several antidotes and prescribed others for her to take in his absence. The potassium permanganate produced severe nausea, burning sensation in the mouth, throat and stomach, causing her to vomit at intervals from about two o'clock in the afternoon until seven or eight o'clock the following morning. Plaintiff testified that she suffered great pain from the immediate effect of the drug*, and since taking it had lost weight, experienced a failing of eyesight and suffered with her back and kidneys. The defendant and four other physicians testified, substantially, that the potassium permanganate taken by plaintiff would not have caused her any permanent injury. She admits having suffered intermittently from influenza or colds after taking the tablet. She had also...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Flanagan v. Mott, s. 12003
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1960
    ...was influenced by passion, partiality, corruption, or prejudice or misled by some mistaken view of the case.' Point 2, Syllabus, Collins v. Skaggs, 110 W.Va. 518 3. The filing of a bill of particulars is within the sound discretion of the trial court. 4. The stopping of a bus by a common ca......
  • Jordan v. Bero
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • September 17, 1974
    ...discomfort.' Id. at page 843 of the South Eastern Second Report. In this case we recognize and apply the rule of Collins v. Skaggs, 110 W.Va. 518, 159 S.E. 515 (1931), which 'The law furnishes no measure of damages for pain and suffering. In such case, the decision of the jury upon the amou......
  • Raines v. Faulkner
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • October 21, 1947
    ...Looney v. Railway Co., 102 W. Va. 40, 135 S. E. 262, 48 A. L. R. 806; Landau v. Farr, 104 W. Va. 445, 140 S. E. 141; and Collins v. Skaggs, 110 W. Va. 518, 159 S. E. 515. Since virtually all of the damages are of an indeterminate nature, we are guided by the principle set forth in the Trice......
  • Raines v. Faulkner
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • October 21, 1947
    ... ... W. Railway Co., 102 W.Va. 40, 135 S.E. 262, 137 S.E. 756, 48 ... A.L.R. 806; Landau v. Farr, 104 W.Va. 445, 140 S.E ... 141; and Collins v. Skaggs, 110 W.Va. 518, 159 S.E ... 515. Since virtually all of the damages are of an ... indeterminate nature, we are guided by the principle ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT