Collins v. State, 64062

Decision Date09 September 1982
Docket NumberNo. 64062,64062
Citation163 Ga.App. 403,294 S.E.2d 623
PartiesCOLLINS v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Guerry R. Thornton, Jr., Savannah, for appellant.

C. Paul Rose, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dupont Cheney, Dist. Atty., Hinesville, for appellee.

CARLEY, Judge.

On May 9, 1980, appellant entered a plea of guilty to a charge of armed robbery and was sentenced to ten years. On August 8, 1980, within the same term of court, appellant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. After a hearing on the motion, the trial court refused to allow appellant to withdraw his plea and appellant appeals.

"An accused may withdraw a guilty plea at any time before judgment is announced and may then plead not guilty. However, once sentence is pronounced (as occurred in this case), a withdrawal of a plea is within the sound discretion of the court, and this discretion will not be disturbed unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion. [Cit.]" Kight v. State, 158 Ga.App. 698, 699, 282 S.E.2d 176 (1981). " '[A]fter a prisoner raises the question of the validity of his plea of guilty, the burden is on the state to show that the plea was intelligently and voluntarily entered. The state may accomplish this end by two means, (1) showing on the record of the guilty plea hearing that the defendant was cognizant of all the rights he was waiving and the possible consequences of his plea; or (2) fill a silent record by use of extrinsic evidence that affirmatively shows that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary.' [Cit.]" Conlogue v. State, 243 Ga. 141(2), 253 S.E.2d 168 (1979).

"The evidence at the hearing, including the transcript of the guilty plea hearing, fully authorized the finding that appellant's guilty [plea was] knowingly and voluntarily made. The state met [its] burden ... There was no error in denying appellant's motion to withdraw the [plea]. [Cit.]" Webster v. State, 147 Ga.App. 322, 323(1), 248 S.E.2d 697 (1978). On the record before us "the trial court hearing the motion to withdraw the guilty [plea] was authorized to find, despite assertions to the contrary, that appellant's [plea was] freely and voluntarily given, uninfluenced by any promises ... The evidence in the instant case amply supports a finding that appellant's [plea] of guilty [was] knowingly and voluntarily made, contrary to any assertions made subsequent to the pronouncement of sentence. There was no abuse of discretion in denying appellant's motion to withdraw [his plea]. [Cit.]...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Wilcox v. State, A98A2205.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 4, 1999
    ...that affirmatively shows that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Collins v. State, 163 Ga.App. 403, 294 S.E.2d 623 (1982). In this case, the court reviewed Wilcox's guilty plea transcript and heard testimony from Wilcox, his counsel, and the ass......
  • State v. Kight
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 1985
    ...withdrawal of a plea. McCrary v. State, 215 Ga. 887, 114 S.E.2d 133; Hill v. State, 167 Ga.App. 746, 307 S.E.2d 537; Collins v. State, 163 Ga.App. 403, 294 S.E.2d 623. We do not think this means that after sentence is pronounced thereafter forever the trial court has discretion to allow wit......
  • Dalton v. State, A00A1317.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 8, 2000
    ...unless that discretion is manifestly abused. Wilcox v. State, 236 Ga.App. 235, 236(2), 511 S.E.2d 597 (1999); Collins v. State, 163 Ga. App. 403, 294 S.E.2d 623 (1982). We find no abuse of discretion. On the contrary, the trial court carefully and methodically explained to Dalton exactly wh......
  • Atlanta Professional Ass'n for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, P. C. v. Allen
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 9, 1982
    ... ... , does not specifically indicate that it considered the affidavit in question, the order does state that the trial court considered appellant's brief. The brief was filed on the same date as the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT