Collins v. The German-American Mutual Life Association of Burlington, Iowa
Decision Date | 18 April 1905 |
Citation | 86 S.W. 891,112 Mo.App. 209 |
Parties | COLLINS, Appellant, v. THE GERMAN-AMERICAN MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATION OF BURLINGTON, IOWA, Respondent |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.--Hon. Wm. Zachritz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Judgment affirmed.
O. J Mudd for appellant.
The depositions from Ireland are private records. Defendant does not show that they were kept in compliance with any public law of Great Britain or Ireland. It is not shown that there was at the time the records were made any rule or custom of the Catholic Church requiring them to be kept. Under these conditions they lack the essential requisites of legal evidence. Haile v. Palmer, 5 Mo. 403; Childers v. Cutter, 16 Mo. 24; Morrissey v. Ferry Co., 47 Mo. 524; Moore v. Mfg. Co., 113 Mo. 109, 20 S.W 975; 1 Greenleaf on Ev. (15th Ed.), sec. 493, p. 641, secs 483-4, page 631; 2 Burr W. Jones on Ev. (Pony), sec. 522, p. 1163.
W. C. & J. C. Jones for respondent.
The suit is on a policy of insurance. The petition is in the usual form and alleges such facts as, if true, would entitle plaintiff to recover. The answer admitted all the allegations of the petition, except it set forth, as an affirmative defense, a breach of warranty by the insured, in that, in her application for the policy, she misrepresented and falsely warranted her age; that she warranted herself not to be older than fifty-nine years at the date of the making of the contract of insurance, when in fact she was seventy-two years of age. And it is further alleged in answer that defendant is an insurance company doing business only on the assessment plan. On the trial this latter allegation of the answer was admitted, also that the defendant was restricted and limited by its charter to conducting insurance business on the assessment plan. On the pleadings the trial was restricted to one issue, to-wit: whether or not the insured warranted her age and whether there was a breach of warranty in respect to her age. The court properly ruled that the burden of proof was on defendant, and the defendant assumed the burden.
To establish its defense defendant read the following from the application for insurance:
Also the following clause in said application:
"I hereby agree that the foregoing statements and answers are by me warranted to be complete and true, and are offered to said association as a consideration of the contract; and I further agree that failure to comply with any of the terms of this agreement, or with any of the conditions and agreements contained in the certificate of membership (should one be issued) then this agreement shall become null and void, and all moneys which have been paid shall be forfeited to the association, for its sole use and benefit."
Defendant also read from the proofs furnished it by plaintiff the following extract from plaintiff's affidavit:
Defendant then offered in evidence the affidavit of Franciska Bierman, in which he stated that he had known deceased for ten years and that she was seventy-five years old at her death.
Defendant then offered depositions taken in Ireland, to which plaintiff objected on the ground that the subject-matter of the same is
The objections were overruled by the court and the plaintiff excepted to the ruling of the court, and saved her exceptions.
The depositions consist of the following exhibits:
Exhibit A, headed, "Baptismal Certificate St. Mary's Parish, Clonmel." Said certificate, (exhibit A.) states and expresses upon its face:
The certificate is subscribed and attested as follows:
Said exhibit has written on the face with pen and ink the following names:
Exhibit B, headed, "Baptismal Certificate, St. Mary's Parish, Clonmel." This certificate upon its face expresses the following:
The certificate is attested and signed as follows:
This certificate has written on its face in ink the following names:
Exhibit C. This certificate is headed, "Baptismal Certificate, St. Mary's Parish, Clonmel," and expresses and purports upon its face in printing and ink as follows:
And has in printing and writing at the bottom the following:
And has written in ink on the face of it the following names:
Exhibit D, headed, "Baptismal Certificate, St. Mary's Parish, Clonmel," and expressed upon its face the following:
Certified and signed as follows:
This certificate has written upon its face the following names:
Exhibit E, is headed, "Baptismal Certificate Extracted from the Baptismal Register of S. S. Peter and Paul's, Clonmel," and expressed the following:
And has the following certificate:
This certificate has written on it with pen and ink the following:
Exhibit G, headed, "Marriage Certificate, Roman Catholic Parish of SS. Peter and Paul, Clonmel," and expresses upon its face the following:
and is certified as follows:
The...
To continue reading
Request your trial