Columbia Ry., Gas & Elec. Co. v. Query
Decision Date | 06 April 1926 |
Docket Number | 11950. |
Parties | COLUMBIA RY., GAS & ELECTRIC CO. v. QUERY et al., Constituting the South Carolina Tax Commission. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Richland County; C. C Featherstone, Judge.
Action by the Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Company against Walter G. Query and others, constituting the South Carolina Tax Commission. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
J. B S. Lyles, of Columbia, for appellant.
John M Daniel, Atty. Gen., and Cordie Page, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.
The three exceptions present the single question whether the plaintiff is "engaged in the business of manufacturing," with reference to its gas and power business, and whether it must pay the manufacturer's tax on the gross receipts from those businesses under section II-A of the act of 1923.
The Columbia Gas Light Company was chartered by an act of the Legislature in 1852 (12 Stat. 184). Section 2 of that act provides:
"That the said corporation shall have full power and authority to manufacture, make, and sell gas, to be made of rosin, coal, oil, turpentine or other material, and to furnish such quantities of gas as may be required in or near the town of Columbia, for lighting the streets, stores, manufactories, and buildings," etc.
The Congaree Gas & Electric Company was incorporated by special act of the Legislature, December 24, 1887 (19 Stat. 1103). Section 2 of this act is as follows:
"That said corporation shall have full power and authority to manufacture, make and sell gas, to be made of rosin, coal, oil, turpentine, or other material, and to furnish such quantities of gas as may be required in or near the city of Columbia, for lighting the streets, stores, manufactories and buildings there situate, and for heating and other purposes; to lay pipes or other conductors for conducting gas through the streets, alleys, lanes and squares of the city of Columbia aforesaid, or its vicinity; and the said corporation shall have full power and authority to carry on and conduct the business of using electricity for any purpose, and of manufacturing light, heat and power, or either or all of them, by electricity or any other agent or agents whatsoever, within the said state and to the inhabitants thereof, for lighting and heating and streets, roads, lanes, alleys, avenues and public grounds of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Duke Power Co. v. Bell
... ... authority of the decision of our court in the case of ... Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co. v. South Carolina ... Tax Commission, 134 ... Legislature alone." Santee Mills v. Query, 122 ... S.C. 158, 115 S.E. 202, 203. "Every presumption must be ... ...
-
State ex rel. Winterfield v. Hardin County Rural Elec. Co-Op.
... ... Power Co. v. Bell, 156 S.C. 299, 152 S.E. 865, 868.There ... was the same holding in Columbia Ry., Gas & Electric Co ... v. Query et al., 134 S.C. 319, 132 S.E. 611. In ... Society for ... ...
-
Duke Energy Corp. v. S.C. Dep't of Revenue
...Energy and other electric utilities to be manufacturers, for purposes of the tax code. In Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co. v. Query, 134 S.C. 319, 132 S.E. 611 (1926), an electric company challenged a tax assessed against it under the “Manufacturer's Tax Act.” 134 S.C. at 321, 132 S.E. ......