Colwell v. Royal Int'l Trading Corp.

Decision Date19 November 1999
Docket NumberNo. 98-5626,98-5626
Citation196 F.3d 1225
Parties(11th Cir. 1999) In re William Frederick COLWELL and Ruby Colwell, Debtors. William Frederick Colwell, Ruby Colwell, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Royal International Trading Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Non-Argument Calendar.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (No. 97-8500-CIV-ASG), Alan S. Gold, Judge.

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The Colwells jointly filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case. Although Florida law does not recognize legal separations the Colwells had been separated for 31/2 years before filing the petition. Prior to the bankruptcy petition each had acquired a separate home and had obtained a separate homestead exemption on that home.

Florida has chosen to opt out of federal exemptions and elected to apply its own. 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(1); Fla. Stat. 222.21 and 222.20; 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, 522.08 at 522-44, n. 8a. The Colwells asserted to the bankruptcy court that Article X, 4 of the Florida constitution required that they be granted separate homestead exemptions. Royal International excepted. In 1998 the bankruptcy court sustained the exception, stating that it could find no case law to support dual homestead exemptions for married individuals residing on two distinct, non-contiguous parcels of property. See In re Colwell, 208 B.R. 85 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1997). The Colwells appealed to the United States District Court, S.D. Florida, which reversed the bankruptcy court. Royal appealed to the Eleventh Circuit.

Pursuant to Erie Railway the bankruptcy court must interpret and apply the Florida exemption law in the same manner as a Florida state court. Florida state court decisions establish that as a matter of the public policy of the state, giving a liberal construction as required, a homestead exemption can be established to each of two people who are married but legitimately living apart in separate residences, if they otherwise meet the requirements of the exception, and, by "legitimately" they mean that there is no fraudulent or otherwise egregious act by the beneficiary of the exemption. Law v. Law, 738 So.2d 522 (Fla.App. 4th Dist.1999); In re Englander, 95 F.3d 1028 (11th Cir.1996) (closely analyzing Florida law and using Florida state court cases to determine the applicability of the Florida homestead exemption); ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • In re Ronald G. Stewart And Debra A. Stewart
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Central District of Illinois
    • May 12, 2011
    ...to the same extent and with the same effect as in state court. In re Duncan, 329 F.3d 1195, 1198 (10th Cir.2003); In re Colwell, 196 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir.1999); In re Anderson, 824 F.2d 754, 756 (9th Cir.1987); In re Neal, 344 B.R. 456, 461 (Bankr.W.D.Va.2004). The statute focuses squarely, ......
  • In re Pace
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Mississippi
    • October 10, 2014
    ...a separate homestead exemption in his or her residence in accordance with state law. See, e.g., Colwell v. Royal International Trading Corp. (In re Colwell), 196 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir.1999); In re Roberge, 307 B.R. 442, 448 (Bankr.D.Vt.2004). 9. The requirement that the debtor reside on the p......
  • In re Pace, 13–14017–JDW.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Mississippi
    • October 10, 2014
    ...a separate homestead exemption in his or her residence in accordance with state law. See, e.g., Colwell v. Royal International Trading Corp. (In re Colwell), 196 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir.1999) ; In re Roberge, 307 B.R. 442, 448 (Bankr.D.Vt.2004).9 The requirement that the debtor reside on the pr......
  • Menchise v. Akerman Senterfitt
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • July 2, 2008
    ...law of the forum state governs issues of state law that arise in bankruptcy proceedings. See Colwell v. Royal Int'l Trading Corp. (In re Colwell), 196 F.3d 1225, 1226 (11th Cir.1999); Fruehauf Corp. v. Revitz (In re Transystems, Inc.), 569 F.2d 1364, 1366 (5th Cir.1978). Steffen's malpracti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Bankruptcy - the Honorable W.h. Drake, Jr. and Christopher S. Strickland
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 51-4, June 2000
    • Invalid date
    ...Group, Inc., 734 F.2d 794, 795-96 (11th Cir. 1984)). 101. Id. Bankruptcy Rule 7054 incorporates Rule 54(b). Id. 102. Id. at 1287. 103. 196 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 1999). 104. Id. at 1226. 105. Florida has opted out of federal exemptions, deciding instead to apply its own set of exemption stand......
  • Florida's unlimited homestead exemption does have some limits.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 77 No. 1, January 2003
    • January 1, 2003
    ...couples may find themselves in the situation of benefiting from two homestead exemptions. The U.S. Court of Appeals in In re Colwell, 196 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 1999), held that a married couple living in separate residences for over three years prior to the filing of their respective bankrup......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT