Com. v. Abboud
Citation | 346 Mass. 765,193 N.E.2d 264 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. James A. ABBOUD. |
Decision Date | 15 October 1963 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts |
James A. Abboud, pro se.
William A. Doherty, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the Commonwealth.
Before WILKINS, C. J., and SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL, and REARDON, JJ.
The defendant was found guilty of rape. He moved for a new trial. After hearing, his motion was denied and he excepted to the denial. The denial was a matter of the wise exercise of discretion by the judge. No abuse of discretion appears.
Exceptions overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Crowell
...of the motion rested in the discretion of the judge. Commonwealth v. Sitko, Mass., 190 N.E.2d 902, 1 and cases cited. Commonwealth v. Abboud, Mass., 193 N.E.2d 264. 2 Although the case is not properly before us in any one of the several permissible ways recognized and discussed in Guerin v.......
- DiMinico & Cincotta, Inc. v. Fire Commissioner of Boston