Com. v. Abboud

Citation346 Mass. 765,193 N.E.2d 264
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH v. James A. ABBOUD.
Decision Date15 October 1963
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

James A. Abboud, pro se.

William A. Doherty, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the Commonwealth.

Before WILKINS, C. J., and SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL, and REARDON, JJ.

RESCRIPT

The defendant was found guilty of rape. He moved for a new trial. After hearing, his motion was denied and he excepted to the denial. The denial was a matter of the wise exercise of discretion by the judge. No abuse of discretion appears.

Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Com. v. Crowell
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • April 29, 1964
    ...of the motion rested in the discretion of the judge. Commonwealth v. Sitko, Mass., 190 N.E.2d 902, 1 and cases cited. Commonwealth v. Abboud, Mass., 193 N.E.2d 264. 2 Although the case is not properly before us in any one of the several permissible ways recognized and discussed in Guerin v.......
  • DiMinico & Cincotta, Inc. v. Fire Commissioner of Boston
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • October 15, 1963

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT