Com. v. Cass
| Decision Date | 02 November 1970 |
| Citation | 263 N.E.2d 422,358 Mass. 805 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Thomas A. CASS. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Reuben Goodman, Boston, for defendant.
Matthew J. Ryan, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Leonard E. Gibbons, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the Commonwealth, submitted a brief.
Before SPALDING, CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL, REARDON and QUIRICO, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
These indictments charge the defendant with (a) unlawfully carrying a sawed-off shotgun, (b) armed robbery while masked, and (c) conspiracy to commit armed assault with intent to rob. He was tried before a judge without jury and found guilty on all indictments. The case has been appealed under G.L. c. 278, §§ 33A--33G. The case was tried by competent counsel and we see no occasion for discussing alleged errors to which no exceptions were taken. See COMMONWEALTH V. FOLEY, 263 N.E.2D 451.A It is contended that the trial judge erred in permitting an in-court identification of the defendant. He argues that the case of United States v Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149, is here applicable because when the defendant was identified at the Chicopee police station he was not represented by counsel. We summarize the facts relating thereto. The defendant, together with two other men, was placed under arrest by officers of the Chicopee police department, charged with '(s)uspicion of a felony, armed robbery' and was taken to the police station. Shortly thereafter, the victim of the robbery went into the room where the three men were, observed them, and in the presence of the defendant stated, 'He is the one that held me up.' The defendant's argument on this point ignores other testimony that the victim had ample opportunity to observe the defendant at the time of the holdup; that he based his identification on the defendant's height, age, size, weight, clothing and facial features, which the victim was able to see 'through the nylon stocking' with which the defendant had covered his face. We are satisfied that the in-court identification was based on observations of the defendant other than the identification in the police station. Commonwealth v. Robinson, 355 Mass. 620, 621--622, 246 N.E.2d 669. We do not agree with the defendant that the interception of the automobile in which he was riding was without probable cause. The officers had a description of the getaway car and one of the occupants fitted the description that had been received by the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Brown
...Brown, 354 Mass. 337, 342, 237 N.E.2d 53 (1968); Commonwealth v. Breen, 357 Mass. 441, 446, 258 N.E.2d 543 (1970); Commonwealth v. Cass, 358 Mass. 805, 263 N.E.2d 422 (1970); Commonwealth v. Jackson, 359 Mass. 759, 269 N.E.2d 279 (1971); Commonwealth v. Avery, --- Mass. ---, --- e, 309 N.E.......
-
Com. v. Carrington
...had committed the burglary and rape. Officer Broderick, therefore, had probable cause to arrest the defendant. Commonwealth v. Cass, 358 Mass. 805, 263 N.E.2d 422 (1970). Commonwealth v. Storey, supra. Commonwealth v. Bowden, supra. Commonwealth v. Hason, 387 Mass. 169, 174, 439 N.E.2d 251 ......
-
Com. v. Flaherty
...was independent of an impermissible confrontation. See Commonwealth v. Cefalo, 357 Mass. 255, 257 N.E.2d 921; Commonwealth v. Cass, 358 Mass. 805, 263 N.E.2d 422;C COMMONWEALTH V. MCGRATH, MASS., 263 N.E.2D 466.D It is also significant that the observations made at the robbery were 'under c......
-
Com. v. Murphy
... ... 25. Gray 357 Mass. 771 771 --- 771 --- ... (257 N.E.2d 924) (925) (925) ... Mass. Adv. Sh ... -------------- ... 26. Cass (1970) 1407 1407 --- --- --- ... (263 N.E.2d 422) (423) ... 27. Appleby (1970) 1559 1564 --- --- --- ... (265 N.E.2d 485) (489) ... 28. Underwood (1970 1671 ... ...