Com. v. Delaney
| Decision Date | 27 April 1989 |
| Citation | 404 Mass. 1004,537 N.E.2d 141 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Charles C. DELANEY, III. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
William F. Asci, Asst. Dist. Atty., for Com.
Kevin J. Reddington, Brockton, for defendant.
Before WILKINS, LIACOS, NOLAN, LYNCH and O'CONNOR, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
On April 29, 1988, a Superior Court judge ordered that the defendant submit to a psychiatric examination pursuant to G.L. c. 123, § 15 (1986 ed.), and that the defendant be afforded the opportunity to videotape any interview made as part of the psychiatric evaluation. The judge simultaneously reported for appellate consideration, pursuant to Mass.R.Crim.P. 34, 378 Mass. 905 (1979), the question whether "the constitutional right of a criminal defendant to assistance of counsel includes the right to tape or otherwise record a court-ordered psychiatric examination." On March 16, 1989, we remanded the matter to the motion judge for a ruling in the exercise of his discretion on the defendant's motion. On April 10, 1989, the judge issued a ruling explaining that, in addition to the reasons given in his original report, his order was also based on a review of case law, a balancing of the rights of both the Commonwealth and the defendant, and an exercise of his discretion.
Since it is within the judge's discretion to allow the defendant to record a psychiatric evaluation in circumstances where the defendant has indicated an intention to interpose an insanity or lack of criminal responsibility defense, we need not decide the constitutional question presented. See Commonwealth v. Chubbuck, 384 Mass. 746, 752, 429 N.E.2d 1002 (1981) (); Blaisdell v. Commonwealth, 372 Mass. 753, 769, 364 N.E.2d 191 (1977) ().
We therefore decline to answer the question.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Trapp
...by the judge's discretion to allow defense counsel to attend the Blaisdell interview, or to require videotaping. See Delaney, supra at 1005, 537 N.E.2d 141. There is no abuse of that discretion shown, and, hence, no 2. Instructional Errors. a. Criminal responsibility. Trapp's appellate coun......
-
Com. v. Baldwin
...an insanity or lack of criminal responsibility defense to videotape a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation. Commonwealth v. Delaney, 404 Mass. 1004, 1005, 537 N.E.2d 141 (1989). We have also upheld a judge's discretion to deny a request that counsel be present at a court-ordered psychiatric......
-
Commonwealth v. Hiser
... ... Commonwealth be electronically recorded. See ... Commonwealth v. Delaney, 404 Mass. 1004, 1005 ... (1989) ... 3. The ... Supreme Judicial Court has observed that there are many ... ...