Com. v. Dias
| Citation | 267 N.E.2d 921,358 Mass. 819 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Allan J. DIAS. |
| Decision Date | 24 February 1971 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Robert W. Kelley, Brockton, for defendant.
Brian E. Concannon, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the Commonwealth.
Before TAURO, C.J., and CUTTER, SPIEGEL, REARDON, and QUIRICO, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
The defendant was convicted on three indictments charging him with crimes punishable under the following provisions of the General Laws: c. 265, § 15B; c. 266, § 28; and c. 266, § 104. The evidence, in large part circumstantial, but including damaging admissions by the defendant, permitted the jury to find that on February 5, 1968, the defendant's license and right to operate motor vehicles having been revoked, he drove a stolen automobile in Hanson without the authority of the owner; that he drove it past the house of one MacKenzie, the chief of the town police; and that he fired seven shots, six of which struck the house and broke four panes of glass. Two were fired while MacKenzie was on his front porch and one of these struck within one or two feet from MacKenzie. We have considered all of the errors alleged by the defendant and argued in his brief and which are based on seasonable exceptions. We find no error. The jury could find that certain unsolicited, unprovoked, self-implicating, boastful and in part threatening statements made by the defendant to MacKenzie on June 12 and 21, 1968, related to the offences of February 5, 1968. The statements constituted an admission by the defendant and were properly allowed in evidence even though made more than four months after the offence. Commonwealth v. Ladetto, 349 Mass. 237, 244, 207 N.E.2d 536; Commonwealth v. Sullivan, 354 Mass. 598, 609, 239 N.E.2d 5. The defendant asks us to decide that the police searched premises and seized an article not described in an admittedly valid search warrant which is not before us and the contents of which are not in the record or transcript. We cannot make such a decision on the record and transcript before us. Even if we were to assume, as the defendant asks us to do, that the warrant authorized only a search for and seizure of a gun, and that the police in executing the warrant found and seized some live shells and a spent shell, such a seizure would not be unlawful. See Commonwealth v. Wojcik, Mass., 266 N.E.2d 645, a and cases cited. There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the charge under G.L. c....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Dutney
...the conversation were nevertheless admissible against Grondine by reason of his admission of guilt found therein. Commonwealth v. Dias, 358 Mass. 819, 267 N.E.2d 921 (1971). Dutney voiced no objection, nor did he request a limiting 1 Commonwealth v. Dexter Dutney (two indictments) and Commo......
-
Com. v. Perry
...unreasonable because of her physical or psychological condition, as indicated by the nurse and the father. Cf. Commonwealth v. Dias, 358 Mass. 819, 820, 267 N.E.2d 921 (1971). The question reduces to whether the substituted method of communication actually used was permissible in the Althou......
-
Com. v. Ryan
...356 Mass. 358, 360, 252 N.E.2d 336 (1969), where the defendant or his condition frustrated delivery, see, e.g., Commonwealth v. Dias, 358 Mass. 819, 820, 267 N.E.2d 921 (1971); Commonwealth v. Babb, 389 Mass. 275, 277, 450 N.E.2d 155 (1983); Commonwealth v. Perry, 15 Mass.App.Ct. 281, 283, ......
-
Commonwealth v. Nason
...intoxicated, uncooperative, incoherent, had a head injury, and, upon being questioned, told the officer to leave. Cf. Commonwealth v. Dias, 358 Mass. 819, 820 (1971) (violator may, by his conduct, forfeit his right to receive citation at time and place of violation). The officer could reaso......