Com. v. GARZONE
Decision Date | 13 April 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 695 EDA 2009.,695 EDA 2009. |
Citation | 993 A.2d 306 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Gerald GARZONE, Appellant. |
Court | Pennsylvania Superior Court |
John Morris, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Mariana Sorensen, Assistant District Attorney, and Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered on January 30, 2009 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County following Appellant Gerald Garzone's guilty plea to numerous charges, including corrupt organizations, criminal conspiracy, 244 counts of theft by unlawful taking (for theft of body parts), abuse of corpse, recklessly endangering another person, and fraudulently obtaining food stamps or other public assistance1 in connection with his participation in the illegal harvesting and sale of human body parts from corpses, as well as filing false forms seeking reimbursement from the government for providing funeral services for which he had already been paid. As part of Appellant's sentence, upon the filing of a timely post-sentence motion by the Commonwealth, the trial court directed Appellant to pay $90,028, which was comprised of $84,723 for the salaries of the assistant district attorneys and county detectives assigned to the District Attorney's Office, as well as $5,305 for the grand jury costs. On appeal, Appellant contends the trial court did not have the authority to order Appellant to pay the expenses associated with the district attorneys' salaries, the county detectives' salaries, or the grand jury costs. We vacate Appellant's judgment of sentence as it relates to the costs for the assistant district attorneys' and county detectives' salaries but affirm in all other respects.
¶ 2 The relevant factual history has been aptly set forth by the trial court as follows:
Trial Court Opinion filed 6/1/09 at 2-4 (footnote omitted) (footnotes added).
¶ 3 The Commonwealth submitted this case to the Grand Jury in May of 2006, and after the Grand Jury recommended multiple charges be filed against Appellant Gerald Garzone, he was arrested. Trial was scheduled for September 2, 2008, and represented by counsel, Appellant informed the Commonwealth that he intended to proceed to trial with Co-Defendant Louis Garzone, despite the fact Lee Cruceta, who led the "cutters," Mr. Mastromarino, and Mr. McCafferty had advised the Commonwealth they intended to plead guilty and cooperate with the Commonwealth. Thus, the Commonwealth prepared its numerous witnesses for trial, with an estimated trial length of three months. See Trial Court Opinion filed 6/1/09 at 6 n. 5.
¶ 4 However, on September 2, 2008, Appellant pleaded guilty to the charges indicated supra. With regard to the terms of Appellant's guilty plea, the following relevant exchange occurred:
N.T. 9/2/08 at 44-45 (bold in original).
¶ 5 On October 22, 2009, Appellant proceeded to a sentencing hearing, at the conclusion of which the trial court sentenced Appellant to an aggregate of eight years to twenty years in prison. N.T. 10/22/09 at 276. The trial court noted that "restitution will be ordered in the amount agreed upon." N.T. 10/22/09 at 276. During the sentencing hearing, the Commonwealth requested that the trial court "consider requiring the defendants to pay cost of prosecution or a portion thereof ... as the Commonwealth did have to prepare for trial." N.T. 10/22/09 at 272. The trial court indicated that it N.T. 10/22/09 at 273. The trial court specifically denied the request. N.T. 10/22/09 at 273.
¶ 6 On October 31, 2008, the Commonwealth filed a "Motion to Reconsider Expenses Incurred by District Attorney," claiming total costs for Appellant and Co-Defendant Louis Garzone in the amount of $17,844. By order entered on December 2, 2008, the trial court granted the Commonwealth's motion to reconsider expenses and ordered the Commonwealth to prepare a list of costs. On December 18, 2008, the Commonwealth filed a "Motion to Amend Its Motion To Reconsider Expenses Incurred By District Attorney," claiming expenses for the assistant district attorneys' salaries, the county detectives' salaries, and the grand jury totaling $373,183 for Appellant and Co-Defendant Louis Garzone.
¶ 7 On January 14, 2009, Co-Defendant Louis Garzone filed a counseled motion seeking a modification of sentence in accordance with the Recidivism Risk Reduction Incentive (RRRI) program,4 and Appellant joined in the motion. On January 22 and 29, 2009, the matter proceeded to hearings, at which the trial court heard argument as to whether Appellant was eligible for an RRRI sentence, as well as the total amount Appellant should pay in expenses for the district attorneys' salaries, the county detectives' salaries, and the grand jury costs. During the January 29, 2009 hearing, the following relevant exchanged occurred regarding the imposition of the expenses:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Commonwealth v. Snyder
...to impose costs ..., we conclude that the [defendant's] claim implicates the legality of his sentence[.]"); Commonwealth v. Garzone , 993 A.2d 306, 316 (Pa.Super. 2010) (same). As such, we will address the merits of this claim despite the fact that Appellant did not raise it before the tria......
-
Commonwealth v. Garzone
...ADA and detective salary hours. Commonwealth v. (Louis) Garzone, 993 A.2d 1245 (Pa.Super.2010); Commonwealth v. (Gerald) Garzone, 993 A.2d 306 (Pa.Super.2010).3 The panel, after noting some older history in this area, analogized to other statutes that allow costs in specifically expressed i......
-
Commonwealth v. Garzone
...of Sentence entered onJanuary 30, 2009 in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, CriminalDivision, at No. CP-51-CR-0012746-2007993 A.2d 306 (Pa. Super. 2010)Appeal from the Judgment of Superior Court entered on April 13, 2010 at No. 780EDA 2009 affirming in part and vacating in par......
-
Commonwealth v. Davis
...should not be liable for such costs. See generally Commonwealth v. Weaver , 76 A.3d 562, 574 (Pa. Super. 2013) ; Commonwealth v. Garzone , 993 A.2d 306, 318-20 (Pa. Super. 2010). Accordingly, we vacate the portion of Davis's sentence that ordered him to pay the costs of prosecution, and rem......