Com. v. O'Hara, 90-P-912
Decision Date | 26 June 1991 |
Docket Number | No. 90-P-912,90-P-912 |
Citation | 571 N.E.2d 51,30 Mass.App.Ct. 608 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. James E. O'HARA. |
Court | Appeals Court of Massachusetts |
Linda M. Fleming, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the Com.
Kevin J. Reddington, Brockton, for defendant.
Before WARNER, C.J., and SMITH and FINE, JJ.
This is an interlocutory appeal by the Commonwealth from a District Court judge's allowance of the defendant's motion to suppress. The judge ordered suppression of evidence stemming from the defendant's arrest in Brockton by a West Bridgewater police officer. 1 The judge based his decision on Commonwealth v. LeBlanc, 407 Mass. 70, 551 N.E.2d 906 (1990). In LeBlanc, the court held that a police officer had no authority under G.L. c. 41, § 98A, to make a warrantless arrest outside his jurisdiction for the offense of operating under the influence of liquor, where the offense (passing through a red light), for which he pursued the defendant across the jurisdictional boundary, was a traffic violation for which the defendant was not subject to arrest.
Here, the judge held a hearing at which the arresting officer testified in regard to the events preceding the defendant's arrest. After the hearing, the judge filed a memorandum of decision which contained, among other things, his findings of fact. We recite the judge's findings of fact in their entirety.
The judge concluded that "[t]he officer's feeling that the defendant was drunk when he made his initial observation does not arise to the level of reason to believe that the defendant had committed an arrestable offense." We disagree.
"[T]he power of a police officer at common law to make an arrest without a warrant is limited to the boundaries of the governmental unit by which he was appointed, unless the police officer is acting in fresh and continued pursuit of a suspected felon who has committed an offense in the officer's presence and within his territorial jurisdiction." Commonwealth v. Grise, 398 Mass. 247, 249, 496 N.E.2d 162 (1986). The Legislature, however, through G.L. c. 41, § 98A, broadened the common law rule by permitting "extraterritorial 'fresh pursuit' arrests for any arrestable offense, whether it be a felony or misdemeanor, initially committed in the arresting officer's presence and within his jurisdiction." Commonwealth v. LeBlanc, supra 407 Mass. at 72, 551 N.E.2d 906. However, "[t]he officer must have some reason to believe that the suspect has committed an arrestable offense before he can pursue and arrest an individual pursuant to § 98A" (emphasis added). Id. at 73, 551 N.E.2d 906. Unlike the traffic violation present in Commonwealth v. LeBlanc, su pra, the offense here was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Owens
...G.L. c. 41, § 98A (1990 ed.). See also Commonwealth v. LeBlanc, 407 Mass. 70, 72-73, 551 N.E.2d 906 (1990); Commonwealth v. O'Hara, 30 Mass.App.Ct. 608, 610, 571 N.E.2d 51 (1991). General Laws c. 41, § 98A, provides that: "A police officer of a city or town who is empowered to make arrests ......
-
Commonwealth v. Jewett
...while under influence where officer observed vehicle swerve and almost hit parked motor vehicles), with Commonwealth v. O'Hara, 30 Mass.App.Ct. 608, 609–610, 571 N.E.2d 51 (1991) (defendant's erratic driving sufficient to provide officer with “some reason to believe” defendant was operating......
-
State v. Tingle
...suspected felon who has committed an offense in the officer's presence and within his territorial jurisdiction." Com. v. O'Hara, 30 Mass.App. 608, 609, 571 N.E.2d 51, 52 (1991), quoting Commonwealth v. Grise, 398 Mass. 247, 496 N.E.2d 162 (1986). It is clear that the common-law exception of......
-
Commonwealth v. Lahey
...this case. General Laws c. 41, § 98A, does not apply because the entire incident occurred in Attleboro. Cf. Commonwealth v. O'Hara, 30 Mass.App.Ct. 608, 609–610, 571 N.E.2d 51 (1991) (West Bridgewater officer who witnessed defendant's erratic operation in West Bridgewater authorized to purs......
-
Table of Cases
...2006) 127 O’Brien, State v., 959 P.2d 647 (Utah App. 1998) 26 O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987) 150, 159 O’Hara, Commonwealth v., 571 N.E.2d 51 (Mass App. 1991) 72 O’Mara, United States v., 963 F.2d 1288 (9th Cir. 1992) 56 O’Neal, People v., 32 P.3d 533 (Colo. App. 2000) 51, 52 O’Neal......
-
Chapter 3. Arrest
...within the officer’s jurisdiction and further required that the arrest be effected within the jurisdiction. Commonwealth v. O’Hara, 571 N.E.2d 51 (Mass App. 1991). Many states preserve the common-law rule and do not allow an officer to make a misdemeanor arrest outside of the officer’s geog......