Com. v. King
Decision Date | 16 June 1987 |
Citation | 508 N.E.2d 1382,400 Mass. 283 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Christopher KING. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
William M. Kunstler, New York City, for defendant.
Dana A. Curhan, Asst. Dist. Atty., for Com.
Before HENNESSEY, C.J., and WILKINS, LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, LYNCH and O'CONNOR, JJ.
The defendant appeals from convictions, after a jury-waived trial, on a charge of unlawfully carrying a firearm without a license, and on three charges of unlawfully carrying a firearm under his control in a motor vehicle, G.L. c. 269, § 10 (a ). The defendant was also convicted on four counts of concealing a firearm with an obliterated serial number, G.L. c. 269, § 11C, but those convictions were placed on file, and are not on appeal. The defendant argues that the trial judge erred in denying his pretrial motion to dismiss the relevant indictments on account of egregious misconduct on the part of the Massachusetts State police. We affirm the convictions.
We quote the judge's findings in connection with the motion to dismiss.
The judge concluded that, considering all the circumstances, King had not been prejudiced. Following the lead of United States v. Morrison, 449 U.S. 361, 364-365, 101 S.Ct. 665, 667-68, 66 L.Ed.2d 564 (1981), the judge concluded that, because there was no prejudice, dismissal of the indictments was inappropriate. Therefore, he denied the defendant's motion to dismiss. The only issue on appeal is whether that ruling was correct.
There was ample evidence to support the judge's finding that neither the police nor Berube had disparaged King's counsel or otherwise impaired King's relationship with counsel. The judge also was warranted in finding that none of the team prosecuting King was involved in, or knew about, the improper surveillance of King's discussions with counsel, or the visits to King at the Bristol County house of correction. Therefore, the judge's finding of no prejudice to the defendant, which addressed the period up to the hearing on the motion to dismiss, must stand.
The judge did not address the question whether the possibility that, after the hearing on the motion but before trial, the police would disclose to the prosecutor information gained by the electronic surveillance of King's conferences with his attorney, presented a substantial threat of prejudice. It is appropriate that we do so. The judge disbelieved that batteries had not been placed in the electronic transmitter. Even if, favorably to the defendant, we treat the judge's expression of disbelief as a finding that King's conferences with his...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Drumgold
...in the absence of prejudice." Commonwealth v. Phillips, 413 Mass. 50, 59, 595 N.E.2d 310 (1992), quoting Commonwealth v. King, 400 Mass. 283, 290, 508 N.E.2d 1382 (1987). See Commonwealth v. Lewin, 405 Mass. 566, 586, 542 N.E.2d 275 (1989). "Whether an indictment should be dismissed upon th......
-
Com. v. Mathews
...that cast aspersions on its exercise"). Our analysis does not, however, end there. As this court noted in Commonwealth v. King, 400 Mass. 283, 290, 508 N.E.2d 1382 (1987), "we have never ordered the dismissal of an indictment for [prosecutorial] misconduct in the absence of Thus, the questi......
-
Com. v. Lewin
...of evidence in such situations). See Commonwealth v. Fontaine, 402 Mass. 491, 498, 524 N.E.2d 75 (1988); Commonwealth v. King, 400 Mass. 283, 290, 508 N.E.2d 1382 (1987); Commonwealth v. Light, 394 Mass. 112, 114-115, 474 N.E.2d 1074 (1985); Commonwealth v. Cinelli, 389 Mass. 197, 207-211, ......
-
Com. v. Leonard
... ... And since there was not even a reasonable suspicion that a crime had been committed--and the Commonwealth claims none--the judge was well on his way to the conclusion that there was here a violation of constitutional rights. The judge considered that only our reasoning in Commonwealth v. King, 389 Mass. 233, 449 N.E.2d 1217 (1983), might deflect him from that conclusion. In that case we considered an encounter with a station wagon parked, its engine running, in a rest area on a cold winter night. The encounter began with an inquiry, proceeded by the police blocking the station wagon's ... ...