Com. v. Martin
| Decision Date | 03 April 1970 |
| Citation | 257 N.E.2d 444,357 Mass. 190 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Franklin D. MARTIN. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Alfred P. Farese, Everett, for defendant.
John N. Nestor, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the Commonwealth.
Before WILKINS, C.J., and KIRK, SPIEGEL, and REARDON, JJ.
The defendant was tried on an indictment charging murder in the first degree of his wife, Constance Martin. After a trial subject to G.L. c. 278, §§ 33A--33G, the jury found the defendant guilty of murder in the second degree. The defendant appeals, assigning as error the dismissal of six veniremen, certain rulings on evidence, the denials of his motions for a mistrial, and the purported refusal by the judge to give certain requested instructions to the jury.
There was evidence that the defendant, living apart from his wife, was driven by his brother to Mrs. Martin's apartment in Lynn on March 17, 1968, to pick up two of the Martin children for the day. A quarrel between the defendant and his wife ensued in the second floor hallway at the door to the apartment. Mrs. Martin was stabbed at least nine times with the defendant's knife. The defendant, who was cut on the hand, departed on foot and was later arrested in a bar.
1. Of the thirty-two veniremen sent to the session before trial the judge excused six without examination, having found as a fact from the nature of their criminal records that they were unsuitable to sit on the case. The defendant makes the extraordinary argument that the judge's action deprived him of a jury which was a 'fair and representative cross-section of the community.' 'It is part of the established tradition in the use of juries as instruments of public justice that the jury be a body truly representative of the community.' Smith v. Texas, 311 U.S. 128, 130, 61 S.Ct. 164, 165, 85 L.Ed. 84. Although a record of conviction of a crime does not necessarily disqualify one from serving as a juror (Commonwealth v. Wong Chung, 186 Mass. 231, 234, 71 N.E. 292), and although the initial responsibility for determining that jurors are 'of good moral character' rests on local officials under G.L. c. 234, § 4, it can hardly be said that persons so chosen with records of conviction must be seated in a capital case, subject only to challenge on voir dire, in order to provide a panel which is 'truly representative of the community.' Much must be left to the discretion of the presiding judge including the desirability of avoiding subsequent motions for mistrials, or embarrassment to jurors who are essentially 'of good moral character.' Commonwealth v. Wong Chung, supra, at 234, 71 N.E. 292. The nature of the six criminal records does not appear in the record. The defendant has produced no proof that the exclusion was the result of arbitrary discrimination. See Commonwealth v. Slaney, 350 Mass. 400, 402, 215 N.E.2d 177. At any rate the defendant has failed to show that he has suffered prejudice because any one of the six jurors did not serve on the jury.
2. The defendant excepted to the admission in evidence of certified copies of two papers which had been filed by Mrs. Martin in the Probate Court: a petition for separate support, alleging 'cruel and abusive treatment,' and a motion for a temporary order prohibiting the defendant 'from imposing on the personal liberty of' Mrs. Martin. Inscribed on one of the documents was an affidavit which stated that notice of the filing of the papers and of the date set for the hearing had been mailed to the defendant. There was also included an order entered on the day of the hearing that prohibited the defendant from restraining the liberty of his wife and granted Mrs. Martin custody of the children. The documents tended to show Mrs. Martin's feelings toward the defendant, and the fact of the defendant's knowledge of her attitude. Evidence of the status of the marital relationship was admissible to show motive. Commonwealth v. Howard, 205 Mass. 128, 148, 91 N.E. 397. Commonwealth v. Bartolini, 299 Mass. 503, 510--511, 13 N.E.2d 382. Commonwealth v. Burke, 344 Mass. 243, 247, 182 N.E.2d 127. Such evidence was admissible even if it tends to show prior criminal acts on the part of the defendant. Commonwealth v. Mercier, 257 Mass. 353, 367--368, 153 N.E. 834.
3. The judge in his discretion denied a voir dire on the admissibility of photographs of the body of the deceased. The photographs and medical testimony concerning them were admitted...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Soares
...of juries as instruments of public justice that the jury be a body truly representative of the community,' " Commonwealth v. Martin, 357 Mass. 190, 191, 257 N.E.2d 444, 446 (1970), quoting from Smith v. Texas, 311 U.S. 128, 130, 61 S.Ct. 164, 85 L.Ed.2d 84 (1940); "(a) defendant is constitu......
-
Com. v. Paszko
...that the defendant "took the risk that whatever he said to others than the police might be told to the police." Commonwealth v. Martin, 357 Mass. 190, 193, 257 N.E.2d 444 (1970). 3. Failure to instruct jury on voluntariness. The defendant asserts reversible error in the trial judge's failur......
-
Com. v. Stone
...statement of testimony was to be disregarded, and that the jury's recollection was to be wholly relied on. Commonwealth v. Martin, 357 Mass. 190, 193, 257 N.E.2d 444 (1970). Commonwealth v. De Christoforo, --- Mass. ---, ---, o 277 N.E.2d 100 (1971). Donnelly v. De Christoforo, 416 U.S. 637......
-
U.S. v. Caron, Criminal No. 94-10040-WGY.
...(holding that the trial court did not err in excusing a juror previously sentenced to six months in jail); Commonwealth v. Martin, 357 Mass. 190, 191, 257 N.E.2d 444 (1970) (holding that trial justice's dismissal of six veniremen without examination on the basis of their prior criminal reco......