Com. v. Mejias, 97-P-0322
| Decision Date | 21 May 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-P-0322,97-P-0322 |
| Citation | 694 N.E.2d 49,44 Mass.App.Ct. 948 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Jesus MEJIAS. |
| Court | Appeals Court of Massachusetts |
Michael W. Seddon, Haverhill, for defendant.
Margaret A. Peterson, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.
RESCRIPT.
Admitting to sufficient facts to warrant a conviction of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, the defendant was sentenced to two years in a house of correction, with ninety days to be served and the balance suspended to August 25, 1997. After ninety days, he was released on probation, one of the conditions of which was adherence to Federal, State, and local laws. The defendant was arrested on April 30, 1996, on a complaint of breaking and entering in the daytime with intent to commit a felony and possession of burglarious tools. On September 8, 1996, he was again arrested on charges of domestic assault and battery. Two days later, he was arrested a third time and charged with possession of cocaine. Based on these charges, the defendant's probation officer surrendered him for violating the condition of his probation, and the judge, following a hearing on December 5, 1996, revoked his probation.
The defendant appeals, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to revoke or, alternatively, that he was denied his right to confront the witnesses against him due to the form in which their evidence was received--namely, a reading by the probation officer of the police reports prepared in connection with each of the three arrests. The reports, he claims, were not sufficiently reliable to justify depriving him of the right to confront his accusers. See Commonwealth v. Maggio, 414 Mass. 193, 196-198, 605 N.E.2d 1247 (1993), on which the defendant relies.
The first police report stated that Khmao Som, a resident in a Lowell housing project, heard a window being smashed and ran to the rear room of her unit, where one of the panes in a window had been broken. She saw (she claimed) the defendant reaching his hand through the broken pane. She ran out through the front and summoned help. When the police arrived, they found the defendant and another man together in the rear of the project, the defendant carrying a hammer and a knife, which the police took for burglarious tools. Khmao Som identified the defendant as the man who had reached through the broken window. The pane in the door was in a condition consistent with her story. The judge, obviously familiar with Commonwealth v. Durling, 407 Mass. 108, 120-122, 551 N.E.2d 1193 (1990), and the Maggio decision, ruled that the police officers' personal observations sufficiently corroborated Khmao Som's story to warrant treating the police report as reliable hearsay. The second police report was based on the complaint of the defendant's girlfriend, who arrived home, saw the defendant...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Thissell
...n. 5, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). See Commonwealth v. Durling, supra at 118-119, 551 N.E.2d 1193; Commonwealth v. Mejias, 44 Mass.App.Ct. 948, 949, 694 N.E.2d 49 (1998). It appears to us that the GPS documents consisting of maps and logs are not hearsay. "Hearsay requires a `state......
-
Com. v. King
...for failure to prosecute is immaterial to the validity of the revocation, as would be an acquittal." Commonwealth v. Mejias, 44 Mass.App.Ct. 948, 949, 694 N.E.2d 49 (1998), citing Commonwealth v. Holmgren, 421 Mass. 224, 225-227, 656 N.E.2d 577 4. The defendant had been served with an earli......
-
Com. v. Ivers, 01-P-0604.
...to be sufficiently reliable, see Commonwealth v. Calvo, 41 Mass.App.Ct. 903, 904, 668 N.E.2d 846 (1996); Commonwealth v. Mejias, 44 Mass.App.Ct. 948, 949, 694 N.E.2d 49 (1998); Commonwealth v. Hill, 52 Mass. App.Ct. 147, 153, 751 N.E.2d 446 (2001). For cases in which hearsay was determined ......
-
Barbosa v. Norfolk Superior Court
...like that filing, is deficient because the second count is time-barred. 11.In support of this holding the appellate court cited to Commonwealth v. Mejias, a state appellate case affirming a probation revocation after a hearing that examined the entire course of conduct underlying a charge o......