Com. v. Rocheleau
Decision Date | 13 February 1989 |
Docket Number | No. 4864,4864 |
Citation | 404 Mass. 129,533 N.E.2d 1333 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Francis A. ROCHELEAU. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Eric Brandt, Committee for Public Counsel Services, Jamaica Plain, for defendant.
Katherine E. McMahon, Asst. Dist. Atty., for Com.
Before HENNESSEY, C.J., and LIACOS, NOLAN, LYNCH and O'CONNOR, JJ.
A Worcester County grand jury returned two indictments charging the defendant, Francis A. Rocheleau, with unnatural sexual intercourse with a child under sixteen years of age. The defendant moved to dismiss the indictments, arguing that the statute of limitations had run and that a subsequent amendment extending the statutory period did not apply retroactively to the charges. A Superior Court judge, pursuant to Mass.R.Crim.P. 34, 378 Mass. 905 (1979), reported the question raised by the defendant's motion to the Appeals Court. We took the reported question on our own motion.
The parties filed a stipulation of facts for the reported question. The offenses which are subjects of the indictments allegedly occurred on or about August 15, 1977, and February 15, 1979. The indictments were returned on July 15, 1987.
General Laws c. 277, § 63, St.1955, c. 781, § 1, imposed a six-year limitation period for violations of G.L. c. 265, § 23. The six-year period for the 1977 offense expired on August 15, 1983, and on February 15, 1985, for the 1979 offense. General Laws c. 277, § 63, however, was amended by St.1985, c. 123, which extended the limitation period to ten years. 1 The ten-year period expired on August 15, 1987, for the 1977 offense and will expire on February 15, 1989, for the 1979 offense.
The Superior Court judge reported the following question: "Whether G.L. c. 277, § 63, 1985 Mass. Acts c. 123, is a bar to the prosecution of July 1987 indictments alleging violations of G.L. c. 265, § 23, which violations allegedly occurred on August 15, 1977, and February 15, 1979."
This case presents an issue distinct from that addressed in Commonwealth v. Bargeron, 402 Mass. 589, 524 N.E.2d 829 (1988), where this court, by a divided vote, applied "a subsequent statute of limitations to offenses not already time barred when the new statute of limitations becomes effective" (emphasis added). Id. at 592, 524 N.E.2d 829.
In this case, the six-year time limitation expired in August, 1983, and February, 1985, respectively, for the two offenses. Statute 1985, c. 123, which extended the time limitation to ten years was approved on July 2, 1985, and made effective ninety days thereafter. Thus, the statute of limitations was extended by an amendment more than seven months after the indictments were time barred under the then effective statute of limitations. The indictments cannot stand. See Bargeron, supra at 592-93 n. 1, 524 N.E.2d 829, citing People v. Smith, 171 Cal.App.3d 997, 217 Cal.Rptr. 634 (1985) ( ); People v. Whitesell, 729 P.2d 985 (Colo.1986) ( ); People v. Massarella, 80 Ill.App.3d 552, 36 Ill.Dec. 16, 400 N.E.2d 436 (1979) (, )cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1077, 101 S.Ct. 855...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Frazer
...deprived of a defense that had been available to him at the time he committed the crime in question."].) 27. (Com. v. Rocheleau (1989) 404 Mass. 129, 533 N.E.2d 1333, 1334 [finding ex post facto violation apparently as a matter of both federal and state constitutional law]; People v. Shedd ......
-
Stogner v. California, 01-1757.
...108 Wash. 2d 662, 667-669, 740 P. 2d 848, 851-852 (1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 485 U. S. 938 (1988); Commonwealth v. Rocheleau, 404 Mass. 129, 130-131, 533 N. E. 2d 1333, 1334 (1989); State v. Nunn, 244 Kan. 207, 218, 768 P. 2d 268, 277-278 (1989); State v. O'Neill, 118 Idaho 244, 247, 7......
-
State v. Cookman
...I have found only one court that has held a revival of a previously time-barred prosecution was unlawful. Commonwealth v. Rocheleau, 404 Mass. 129, 533 N.E.2d 1333 (1989). In that case, the court merely concluded, with little analysis, that such an application was ...
-
STOGNER v. CALIFORNIA
...P. 2d 848, 851-852 (1987) (en bane), cert. denied sub nom. Fied v. Washington, 485 U. S. 938 (1988); Commonwealth v. Rocheleau, 404 Mass. 129, 130-131, 533 N. E. 2d 1333, 1334 (1989); State v. Nunn, 244 Kan. 207, 218, 768 P. 2d 268, 277-278 (1989); State v. O'Neill, 118 Idaho 244, 247, 796 ......