Com. v. Rollo
| Decision Date | 20 October 1909 |
| Citation | 89 N.E. 556,203 Mass. 354 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. ROLLO. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Stephen S. Taft, Dist. Atty., for the Commonwealth.
P. J. Moore, for defendant.
OPINION
One of the legitimate arguments which could have been made against the credibility of the complainant's story was that she did not promptly complain to her mother.While the conversation which took place between the defendant's wife and the complainant was not admissible as evidence of any fact, or even of the good faith of the wife in making the threat therein contained, yet it was admissible as tending to explain the delay of the complainant in making her complaint.This is too plain to require discussion or the citation of authorities.
Exceptions overruled.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 cases
-
Com. v. Edgerly
...(1981) 1987, 1993, 428 N.E.2d 832. See generally Commonwealth v. Cleary, 172 Mass. 175, 177, 51 N.E. 746 (1898); Commonwealth v. Rollo, 203 Mass. 354, 355, 89 N.E. 556 (1909); Commonwealth v. Ellis, 319 Mass. 627, 629-630, 67 N.E.2d 234 (1946); Commonwealth v. Hanger, 357 Mass. 464, 466, 25......
-
Glover v. Callahan
...argument against her credibility may be made solely on the basis of the absence of evidence of such a complaint. Commonwealth v. Rollo, 203 Mass. 354, 89 N.E. 556. The fact that she did not make a complaint ‘is proper to be considered on the question of the weight to be given her testimony.......
-
Com. v. Wilson
...the defendant, who had hit her and warned her not to tell her mother or she (the victim) would be in trouble, see Commonwealth v. Rollo, 203 Mass. 354, 355, 89 N.E. 556 (1909); Commonwealth v. Izzo, 359 Mass. at 42-43, 267 N.E.2d 631; Commonwealth v. Healey, --- Mass.App. ---, ---, b 396 N.......
-
Glover v. Callahan
... ... may be made solely on the basis of the absence of evidence of ... such a complaint. Commonwealth v. Rollo, 203 Mass ... 354 ... The fact that she did not make a complaint "is ... proper to be considered on the question of the weight to be ... given her ... ...
Get Started for Free