Com. v. Staples

Decision Date03 April 1906
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH v. STAPLES.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

T. E. Grover, for the Commonwealth.

E. C. Bumpus and John B. Sullivan, Jr., for defendant.

OPINION

LORING, J.

The regulation here in question was made under St. 1897, p. 537, c. 510, § 1 (now Rev. Laws, c. 75, § 113), which gives the state board of health 'authority to make rules, regulations, and orders for the purpose of preventing the pollution and securing the sanitary protection' of ponds used (inter alia) as sources of water supply. It is not necessary to decide whether the principle acted on in Commonwealth v. Sisson, 189 Mass. 247, 75 N.E. 619, and in Brodbine v. Revere, 182 Mass. 598, 66 N.E. 607, would enable the state board, acting under this statute, to make regulation requiring a permit to cut ice on such ponds. However that may be, the act under which the regulation here in question was made does not authorize the board to delegate the granting or withholding of such a permit to another board, in this case the board of water commissioners of the city of Taunton. For this reason the regulation in question is void, and it does not become necessary to consider the other objections to it raised by the defendant.

Exceptions sustained.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Commonwealth v. MaLetsky
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 23 Septiembre 1909
    ... ... wholly to guard against the danger of fire. Accordingly it ... cannot be sustained on the ground of Com. v. Hubley, ... 172 Mass. 58, 51 N.E. 448, 42 L. R. A. 403, 70 Am. St. Rep ...          We ... assume that it was within the power of ... Coffin v ... Nantucket, 5 Cush. 269; Day v. Green, 4 Cush ... 433; Lowell v. Simpson, 10 Allen, 88; Com. v ... Staples, 191 Mass. 384, 77 N.E. 712; Cicero Lumber ... Co. v. Cicero, 176 Ill. 9, 51 N.E. 758, 42 L. R. A. 696, ... 68 Am. St. Rep. 155; Chicago v ... ...
  • Commonwealth v. Badger
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 29 Noviembre 1922
    ...three respects: (1) The statute confers no authority upon the fire marshal to make any delegation of power or duty. Commonwealth v. Staples, 191 Mass. 384, 77 N. E. 712;Brown v. Newburyport, 209 Mass. 259, 266, 95 N. E. 504. ann. Cas. 1912B, 495; Cawley v. Northern Waste Co., 239 Mass. 540,......
  • Commonwealth v. Slocum
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 24 Mayo 1918
    ...fatal in Day v. Green, 4 Cush. 438,Coffin v. Nantucket, 5 Cush. 269,Newton v. Belger, 143 Mass. 598, 10 N. E. 464, and Com. v. Staples, 191 Mass. 384, 77 N. E. 712, where delegation of such power without legislative sancetion was held illegal. [2] Regulation of the operation of vehicles use......
  • Brown v. City of Newburyport
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 29 Mayo 1911
    ... ... of discretion and judgment for the public weal cannot be ... delegated. They can be performed only in person. Com. v ... Maletsky, 203 Mass. 241, 246, 89 N.E. 245, 24 L. R. A ... (N. S.) 1168, and cases cited; Hill v. Boston, 193 ... Mass. 569, 573, 79 N.E. 825; Com. v. Smith, 141 ... Mass. 135, 140, 6 N.E. 89; Com. v. Staples, 191 ... Mass. 384, ... [209 Mass. 267] ... 386, 77 N.E. 712; Stoughton v. Baker, 4 Mass. 522, ... 530, 3 Am. Dec. 236; Attorney General v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT