Combs v. Commonwealth

Decision Date17 September 1892
Citation20 S.W. 268
PartiesCombs v. Commonwealth.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from circuit court, Jefferson county.

"Not to be officially reported."

Horace Combs, having been convicted of a felony, appeals. Affirmed.

Lewis, J.

There is difference in the testimony in respect to the manner in which the cutting and wounding with which appellant is charged was committed. But as there was evidence tending to show it was done willfully and maliciously, and not in self-defense, and instruction was properly given upon the less offense of cutting in a sudden affray, or sudden heat and passion, we are not authorized to disturb the jury's verdict that appellant was guilty of a felony, and punishable accordingly. It was distinctly and sufficiently charged in the indictment, and fully proved on trial, and also found bye the jury, that appellant had been twice before the present offense convicted of a felony, the punishment of which is confinement in the penitentiary, and therefore the penalty of confinement in the penitentiary for life became, according to section 12, art. 1, c. 29, Gen. St., inevitable, and the court could do no less than so instruct; and the jury, after finding the present offense a felony, was bound to render the verdict in pursuance thereof. The validity of that statute has heretofore been sanctioned by this court, and it is now needless to discuss the question. Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Allen v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (Kentucky)
    • March 11, 1938
    ...settled by Taylor v. Com., 3 Ky. Law Rep. 783, 11 Ky. Op. 642; Chenowith v. Com., 12 S.W. 585, 11 Ky. Law Rep. 561; Combs v. Com., 20 S.W. 268, 14 Ky. Law Rep. 245, and Turner v. Com., 191 Ky. 825, 231 S.W. 519. Students who desire to pursue this question further should examine 16 C.J. p. 1......
  • Jones v. Com.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (Kentucky)
    • March 25, 1966
    ...Cf. Taylor v. Commonwealth, 3 Ky.Law Rep. 783; Chenowith v. Commonwealth, 11 Ky. Law Rep. 561, 12 S.W. 585; Combs v. Commonwealth, 14 Ky.Law Rep. 245, 20 S.W. 268; Turner v. Commonwealth, 191 Ky. 825, 231 S.W. 519; Lovan v. Commonwealth, 261 Ky. 198, 87 S.W.2d 381; Allen v. Commonwealth, 27......
  • Bradley v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Kentucky
    • November 25, 1941
    ...... finally insisted that the punishment inflicted is excessive,. but it is within the limits fixed by the Legislature in a. statute repeatedly upheld by this court. Coleman v. Commonwealth, 276 Ky. 802, 125 S.W.2d 728; Turner v. Commonwealth, 191 Ky. 825, 231 S.W. 519; Combs v. Commonwealth, 20 S.W. 268, 14 Ky.Law Rep. 245. Where the. objection is to the particular sentence and not to the. statute under which it has been imposed, a sentence which is. within the limits fixed by statute, is not excessive and is. therefore valid because the constitutional ......
  • Bradley v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (Kentucky)
    • November 25, 1941
    ...court. Coleman v. Commonwealth, 276 Ky. 802, 125 S.W. (2d) 728; Turner v. Commonwealth, 191 Ky. 825, 231 S.W. 519; Combs v. Commonwealth, 20 S.W. 268, 14 Ky. Law Rep. 245. Where the objection is to the particular sentence and not to the statute under which it has been imposed, a sentence wh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT