Combs v. Incorporated Village of Freeport
| Citation | 527 N.Y.S.2d 443,139 A.D.2d 688 |
| Parties | Martha G. COMBS, et al., Respondents, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF FREEPORT, Appellant. |
| Decision Date | 25 April 1988 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Mulholland, Minion & Roe, Williston Park (George Dieter, of counsel), for appellant.
Levine & Slavit, New York City (Ira S. Slavit, of counsel), for respondents.
Before KUNZEMAN, J.P., and RUBIN, EIBER and SULLIVAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated December 12, 1986, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' action to recover damages caused by an allegedly defective condition in a sidewalk, on the ground that the Village Clerk had not received prior written notice of this condition as required by CPLR 9804, Village Law § 6-628 and Code of Ordinances of the Village of Freeport § 27-2. The admissions by the Assistant Superintendent of the Department of Public Works that the defendant village retained an independent contractor to construct the sidewalk and catch basin at issue as part of street improvements on South Long Beach Avenue combined with the plaintiffs' detailed descriptions, based on personal observations, of the condition of the situs of the accident at the time of its construction and at the time of the accident, suffice to create a triable issue of fact as to whether or not the defendant village was liable for the creation of a dangerous defect in the sidewalk ( cf., Zigman v. Town of Hempstead, 120 A.D.2d 520, 501 N.Y.S.2d 718). An exception to the prior written notice rule exists when the municipality has caused or created a defect or dangerous condition ( see, Freeman v. County of Nassau, 95 A.D.2d 363, 466 N.Y.S.2d 684).
Since the defendant admits the subject sidewalk was constructed as part of a street improvement on Long Beach Avenue, it cannot avoid liability for the allegedly dangerous condition of the sidewalk on the ground that it was caused by an independent contractor. The defendant village has a nondelegable duty to maintain its highways, of which sidewalks are a part ( see, Williams v. State of New York, 34 A.D.2d 101, 104, 309 N.Y.S.2d 795; see generally, 64 N.Y.Jur.2d, Highways, Streets, and Bri...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hill v. Fence Man, Inc.
...202 A.D.2d 488, 609 N.Y.S.2d 54; Matteucci v. County of Nassau, 274 A.D.2d 422, 711 N.Y.S.2d 768; Combs v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 139 A.D.2d 688, 689, 527 N.Y.S.2d 443). Since the Town failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, it is not necessary to conside......
-
LaBarbera v. The Vill. of Sleepy Hollow
...Construction Corp., 41 A.D.3d 585 [2d Dept 2007]; Schuman v City of New York, 304 A.D.2d 643 [2d Dept 2003]; Combs v Village of Freeport, 139 A.D.2d 688 [2d Dept 1988]; Freeman v County of Nassau, 95 A.D.2d 363 [2d Dept 1983]). In fact, the Second Department has held that an issue of fact p......
-
Parks v. Hutchins
...unsafe condition (see, Kierman v. Thompson, 73 N.Y.2d 840, 841-842, 537 N.Y.S.2d 122, 534 N.E.2d 39; Combs v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 139 A.D.2d 688, 527 N.Y.S.2d 443; cf., Hughes v. Jahoda, 75 N.Y.2d 881, 883, 554 N.Y.S.2d 467, 553 N.E.2d 1015). It cannot be seriously disputed that ......
-
Zash v. County of Nassau
...does Highway Law § 139(2). While sidewalks have been held to be within the meaning of the term highway (see, Combs v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 139 A.D.2d 688, 527 N.Y.S.2d 443; Williams v. State of New York, 34 A.D.2d 101, 104, 309 N.Y.S.2d 795; see, generally, 64 NY Jur 2d, Highways,......