Comer v. State ex rel. Hauter

Decision Date07 January 1916
Docket NumberNo. 22757.,22757.
Citation110 N.E. 984,184 Ind. 217
PartiesCOMER et al. v. STATE ex rel. HAUTER et al.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jasper County; Charles W. Hanley, Judge.

Application by the State, on the relation of Percy Hauter and others, for a writ of mandamus, against Stephen T. Comer and others, composing the County Council of Jasper County. From a judgment issuing the writ, defendants appeal. Affirmed.George A. Williams, of Rensselaer, for appellants. A. Halleck, of Rensselaer, for appellees.

SPENCER, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Jasper circuit court ordering the issuance of a writ of mandate, directed to the county council of Jasper county and commanding such council to appropriate the sum of $1,500 for the salary and expenses of a county agent for such county for the year 1915.

[1][2] Omitting the formal allegations the amended complaint charges that the petitioners are resident householders and taxpayers of Jasper county; that appellants are and were members of the county council of said county and are now duly qualified and acting as such; that prior to May 22, 1913, more than 20 residents of the county of Jasper, who were and are actively interested in agriculture, filed with the board of education of said county a petition for the employment of a county agent and also made a deposit of $500 with said board to be used in defraying the expenses of such agent; that said petition was, by the county board of education, filed with the Jasper county council before the special May meeting of said council in the year 1913; that said petition prayed said council to appropriate the sum of $1,500 to be used in paying the salary and other expenses of a county agent for said county for the ensuing year; that on May 22, 1913, said council appropriated the sum of $1,500 out of the funds of Jasper county to be used as prayed in said petition, whereupon the board of education of Jasper county applied to Purdue University for the appointment of a county agent for said county; that said Purdue University designated and appointed one O. G. Barrett as such agent, and said Barrett accepted said appointment and performed the duties of said office for a period of one year and until such time as the moneys appropriated by said council were exhausted, when, on the failure and refusal of appellant council to make a further appropriation to pay for his services he resigned his said office; that at the regular session of said council in September, 1914, it failed, neglected, and refused to appropriate the sum of $1,500 out of the funds of Jasper county to be used...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Jasper County Farm Bureau v. Jasper County
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 30, 1926
    ... ... of the Constitution. State ex rel. v. County Court, ... 142 Mo. 575; Cavanaugh v. Gordon, 244 Mo ... 689; 2 C. J. 989, 990; Norcross ... v. Cole, 187 P. 877 (Nev.) ; Comer v. State, ... 110 N.E. 984; Exposition Driving Park v. Kansas City, 174 ... ...
  • Gaddis v. Bd. of Com'rs of Gibson Cnty.
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • January 13, 1932
    ...County (1926) 85 Ind. App. 281, 151 N. E. 830;State ex rel. Simpson v. Meeker (1914) 182 Ind. 240, 105 N. E. 906;Comer v. State ex rel. Hauter (1916) 184 Ind. 217, 110 N. E. 984. The appellee contends that: “Section 5862 to and including Section 5912, Burns' Ann. St. 1926, known as the Coun......
  • Hendrickson v. Taylor County Farm Bureau
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • October 13, 1922
    ...104 Neb. 838, 178 N.W. 846; Westlake v. Anderson, 33 N.D. 326, 156 N.W. 925; Norcross v. Cole, 44 Nev. 88, 189 P. 877; Comer v. State, 184 Ind. 217, 110 N.E. 984. also, C.J. 989-990. Judgment affirmed. ...
  • Gaddis v. Board of Commissioners of Gibson County
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • January 13, 1932
    ... ... Board, etc. (1926), 85 ... Ind.App. 281, 151 N.E. 830; State, ex rel., v ... Meeker (1914), 182 Ind. 240, 105 N.E. 906; ... Comer v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT